RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Student learning performance and satisfaction with a flipped classroom in undergraduate dental pharmacology education
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.06.07.24308600
DO 10.1101/2024.06.07.24308600
A1 Galvin, Shelia
A1 Lucitt, Margaret
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/08/2024.06.07.24308600.abstract
AB Introduction The flipped classroom (FC) model of blended learning has become more feasible with the advancement of digital technology platforms. Monitoring a FC approach in curriculum delivery provides an opportunity to evaluate its impact on student exam outcomes and satisfaction. Presented here is examination performances and learning experiences in undergraduate dental students taking pharmacological course material using a FC approach compared to that of a traditional classroom (TC) model.Method Ninety- seven students experiencing a FC delivery is compared to 129 students taking a TC approach over 2 academic years. Course lecture topics, scheduling and assessment are consistent across both modes of delivery. At the end of each academic year an anonymous student survey with a closed end question was conducted to gain student feedback regarding course satisfaction.Results The FC positively improved student examination performances compared to the TC approach with a seven percent increase in the percentage mean exam grade and a 15% increase in the number of students obtaining exam grades greater than 50%. An increase in the proportion of students achieving higher grades overall is seen in the FC versus the TC approach from the frequency distribution of exam results. The students also rated the FC more positively in the feedback satisfaction compared to the TC student cohort.Conclusion In summary the student exam grades and feedback here indicate the FC having a positive impact on student outcomes and experience compared to the TC approach. These findings provide evidence to dental pharmacological educators that a FC curriculum delivery can lead to an improvement in student performances in this subject area.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Research Ethics Committee in the School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin reviewed and approved the study design.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript