RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Piloting a minimum data set for older people living in care homes in England: a developmental study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.06.07.24308589
DO 10.1101/2024.06.07.24308589
A1 Gordon, Adam L
A1 Rand, Stacey
A1 Crellin, Elizabeth
A1 Allan, Stephen
A1 Tracey, Freya
A1 De Corte, Kaat
A1 Lloyd, Therese
A1 Brine, Richard
A1 Carroll, Rachael E
A1 Towers, Ann-Marie
A1 Burton, Jennifer Kirsty
A1 Akdur, Gizdem
A1 Hanratty, Barbara
A1 Webster, Lucy
A1 Palmer, Sinead
A1 Jones, Liz
A1 Meyer, Julienne
A1 Spilsbury, Karen
A1 Killett, Anne
A1 Wolters, Arne T
A1 Peryer, Guy
A1 Goodman, Claire
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/08/2024.06.07.24308589.abstract
AB Background We developed a prototype minimum data set (MDS) for English care homes, assessing feasibility of extracting data directly from digital care records (DCRs) with linkage to health and social care data.Methods Through stakeholder development workshops, literature reviews, surveys and public consultation we developed an aspirational MDS. We identified ways to extract this from existing sources including DCRs and routine health and social care datasets. To address gaps we added validated measures of delirium, cognitive impairment, functional independence and Quality of Life to DCR software. Following routine health and social care data linkage to DCRs, we compared variables recorded across multiple data sources, using a hierarchical approach to reduce missingness where appropriate. We reported proportions of missingness, mean and standard deviation (SD) or frequencies (%) for all variables.Results We recruited 996 residents from 45 care homes in three English Integrated Care Systems. 727 residents had data included in the MDS. Additional data were well completed (<35% missingness at wave 1). Competition for staff time, staff attrition, and software-related implementation issues contributed to missing DCR data. Following data linkage and combining variables where appropriate, missingness was reduced (<=4% where applicable).Discussion Integration of health and social care is predicated on access to data and interoperability. Despite governance challenges we safely linked care home DCRs to statutory health and social care datasets to create a viable prototype MDS for English care homes. We identified issues around data quality, governance, data plurality and data completion essential to MDS implementation going forward.Key pointsThere is a range of resident information across DCRs, health and social care datasets, which can be combined to provide a more complete picture of residents.We developed and implemented a Minimum Dataset linking care home digital care records to statutory health and social care records.Information governance for linking data across multiple data owners and data processors is complex and time consuming.Standardisation across Digital Care Records Systems would enable data to be used more effectively across the care home sector.Establishing shared priorities across key stakeholders interested in care home data is essential for effective MDS implementation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/2/e071686 Funding StatementThis project is funded by the NIHR Health Service Research and Delivery programme (HS&DR NIHR127234) and supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England. Several authors are supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaborations in Kent, Surrey and Sussex (AMT); East Midlands (ALG); North East and North Cumbria (BH, AW); Yorkshire and Humber (KS); and East of England (GP, AK, and CG). AG, KS and CG are NIHR Senior Investigators. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study has received ethical approval from the London Queens Square Research Ethics Committee (22/LO/0250).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesPseudonymised data will be available on request from the corresponding author following a 24 month embargo from the date of publication.