PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Fagundes Grilo, Mariana AU - Silva Nunes, Beatriz AU - Duran, Ana Clara AU - Zancheta Ricardo, Camila AU - Galastri Baraldi, Larissa AU - Martinez Steele, Euridice AU - Borges, Camila Aparecida TI - Applying the Nova food classification to food product databases using discriminative ingredients: a methodological proposal AID - 10.1101/2024.04.12.24305721 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.04.12.24305721 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/05/2024.04.12.24305721.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/05/2024.04.12.24305721.full AB - Background Growing interest in the Nova food classification system surged among various stakeholders, driven primarily by compelling evidence linking the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF) to negative health outcomes. However, a more standardized approach could incentivize the identification of UPF in regulatory processes.Objective To propose replicable methods to identify UPF that, by testing the sensitivity and specificity of these methods using a large sample of packaged foods from the 2017 Brazilian Food Labels Database.Methods We created five scenarios to identify UPF using food substances and food additives typically found in UPF and compared them with the most frequently employed Nova food classification process based on the product name and food categories, considered the ‘classic method’ to identify UPF. We estimated the proportion of foods and beverages identified as UPF using different scenarios based on the presence of discriminative ingredients. We used a diagnostic test and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) to understand which of the five scenarios performed better compared to the ‘classic method’ to identify UPF. Finally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to test the role of vitamins and minerals in identifying UPF.Results We found variations in UPF prevalence from 47% to 72% across scenarios, compared to 70% using the ‘classic method’ to identify UPF in Brazilian packaged foods. Despite its cautious approach, the scenario using additives of a sole cosmetic function and food byproducts (scenario 3) identified a 65% UPF, while maintaining reasonable sensitivity and specificity, and the best-performing ROC curve. There was no significant difference in identifying UPF when comparing the addition of vitamins and minerals to the food additives with sole cosmetic function.Conclusion Our study sheds light on the importance of detailed criteria to identify UPF and offers the research community a standardized method to identify UPF.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementM.F.G., A.C.D., and C.B. received funding from Bloomberg Philanthropies. B.S.N. was granted a master scholarship from the Brazilian Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript