PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Kadowaki, Sachiko AU - uçar, Zeynep AU - Fan, Chun-Po Steve AU - Zahiri, Yasmin AU - Yap, Kok Hooi AU - Tocharoenchok, Teerapong AU - Chen, Weidan AU - Dipchand, Anne I. AU - Honjo, Osami AU - Barron, David J. TI - Impact of Cardiac Position, Morphology and Operative Technique on Long-Term Fontan Outcomes in Heterotaxy AID - 10.1101/2024.06.03.24308406 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.06.03.24308406 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/04/2024.06.03.24308406.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/04/2024.06.03.24308406.full AB - Objectives Heterotaxy is characterized by complex venous connections and cardiac position requiring individualized strategies for Fontan. This study aimed to assess 25-year outcomes of heterotaxy patients undergone Fontan operation, with particular focus on morphological features and surgical techniques.Methods 82 consecutive heterotaxy patients who underwent Fontan operation from 1985 to 2021 were compared to 150 with tricuspid atresia (TA) and 144 with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were used for transplant-free survival and predictor analysis.Results Right Atrial Isomerism (RAI) was present in 45 cases and Left Atrial Isomerism (LAI) in 37. The 20-year transplant-free survival was comparable between the groups (RAI vs. LAI, 76% [95% confidence interval, 57-87%] vs. 68% [47-82%], p=0.22). Techniques were extracardiac in 66%, intra-atrial conduit in 9%, lateral tunnel in 18%. More intervention on pulmonary veins occurred in the RAI group. Cardiac position and apicocaval juxtaposition did not influence outcome. The IVC-contralateral PA Fontan was associated with 100% survival, while the IVC-ipsilateral PA Fontan at the side of the cardiac apex showed 67% [34-87%] survival at 20 years. Moderate or severe ventricular dysfunction at 20 years was found in 15% (6-39%) and 0% of RAI and LAI patients among hospital survivors, respectively (p=0.09). In-hospital mortality was higher in heterotaxy (9.8% [5-19%]) compared to TA (1.3% [0.3-5.3%], p<.01) and HLHS (2.8% [1.1-7.3%], p=0.02). There was no in-hospital death after 2000 in any of groups. The 20-year transplant-free survival in heterotaxy (72% [59-82%]) was worse than that in TA (95% [89-97%], p<0.001) but was not significantly different from that in HLHS (80% [69-87%], p=0.11). Reintervention rate at 20 years was significantly higher in heterotaxy (18% [11-29%]) vs. HLHS (8% [4-16%]) (p=0.01). Ventricular dysfunction was a predictor for death (univariate p<0.001).Conclusion Various routing techniques can be successfully applied to overcome the anatomical challenges of heterotaxy. Although higher in-hospital mortality and reintervention rate were found in heterotaxy in the early era, overall survival post Fontan was similar to that in HLHS. RAI had comparable survival to LAI with greater proportion requiring pulmonary vein intervention at time of Fontan.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNone.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Board, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (ID 1000071680).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll the data can be available and need contact to the corresponding author.