RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Vaccine beliefs, adverse effects, and quality of life in patients with cancer undergoing routine COVID-19 vaccination
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.06.02.24308345
DO 10.1101/2024.06.02.24308345
A1 Body, Amy
A1 Donoghoe, Mark
A1 Lal, Luxi
A1 Wakefield, Claire
A1 Ahern, Elizabeth Stephanie
A1 Anazodo, Antoinette
A1 Fuentes Bolanos, Noemi Auxiliadora
A1 Padhye, Bhavna
A1 Downie, Peter
A1 Opat, Stephen
A1 Hamad, Nada
A1 Leahy, Michael Francis
A1 Milch, Vivienne
A1 Segelov, Eva
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/03/2024.06.02.24308345.abstract
AB Background Concerns about side effects and treatment interactions and delays may contribute to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy amongst cancer patients. In the large prospective SerOzNET study of COVID-19 vaccine response in children and adults with cancer, vaccine beliefs, physician- and participant-reported adverse events (AE), treatment interruptions and quality of life (QoL) were studied.Methods The Australian experience with COVID-19 gave a unique opportunity to study vaccination response in an infection- and vaccine-naïve cancer population. Patients with current or recent solid or hematological malignancy, aged five and over, had serial assessments prior to and following multiple SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Electronic surveys were administered at baseline and after first, second and third doses to collect vaccine beliefs (Oxford Confidence and Complacency Scale), patient-reported toxicity and QoL (QLQC30 or PedsQL). Detailed toxicity data were collected at clinic visits and from medical records.Results A total of 1385 vaccination doses were administered (93% BNT162b2), with at least 1 dose received by 499 patients, of whom only seven had known prior COVID-19 infection. Vaccine related beliefs were generally positive. There were no vaccine-related interruptions to cancer therapy. AE occurred in 95% of recipients, with the highest ranked severity being mild in 36% and moderate, severe or serious in 31%, 19% and 6% respectively. QoL showed no significant deterioration post-vaccination.Conclusion This robust dataset provides evidence regarding safety and tolerance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in adults and children with cancer. Patients and families can be reassured that rates of AEs are comparable to the general population and do not impact delivery of cancer therapy or QoL.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialACTRN: 12621001004853Funding StatementFunding support from Cancer Australia, The Victorian Cancer Agency, The Leukaemia Foundation (Australia), Monash Health, and The Cancer Network of Western Australia. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.