RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Management of large polyps in a colorectal cancer screening programme with faecal immunochemical test: a population- and community-based observational study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.15.20103135
DO 10.1101/2020.05.15.20103135
A1 Denis, Bernard
A1 Gendre, Isabelle
A1 Perrin, Philippe
A1 Pioche, Mathieu
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/20/2020.05.15.20103135.abstract
AB Objective To analyse presentation, management and outcomes of large (>= 20 mm) polyps (LPs) detected in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and to compare them with those of a previous guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) programme.Design Retrospective population-based study of all LPs detected in patients aged 50–74 years between 2015 and 2019 during FIT-positive colonoscopies within the screening programme organised in Alsace (France).Results Overall, 1256 LPs (8.5% malignant and 51.8% non-pedunculated) were detected by 102 community gastroenterologists in 1164 patients (one in 12 colonoscopies). Endoscopic resection rate was 82.7% for benign LPs (70.2% non-pedunculated, 95.2% pedunculated, p<0.001), varying from 0 to 100% depending on the endoscopist. It was correlated with endoscopist’s LP resection volume, not with adenoma detection rate. More than 50% of endoscopists did not refer patients to experienced endoscopists, resulting in unwarranted surgery in 60 to 90% of patients with benign LPs. The sensitivity of optical diagnosis of malignancy was 54% for non-pedunculated and 27% for pedunculated T1 CRCs. Endoscopic resection was curative for 4.3% of non-pedunculated and 37.8% pedunculated T1 CRCs. One surgery was avoided for 57 endoscopic submucosal dissections. Management practices did not vary significantly between the gFOBT and FIT periods.Conclusion Compared with current recommendations, there is tremendous room for improvement of community endoscopy practices for the diagnosis and management of LPs. Endoscopic resection is curative in 15.9% of T1 CRCs only. The benefit of endoscopic submucosal dissection is marginal in community practice.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was performed as part of a quality assurance programme within the CRC screening programme in Alsace without dedicated funding. The sources of funding of ADECA Alsace, the association in charge of the programme, include the French Sickness Fund (Assurance Maladie), the French Ministry of Health and the Haut-Rhin and Bas-Rhin Administrations (Conseils Départementaux du Haut-Rhin et du Bas-Rhin). They had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, or writing the report.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll deidentified participant data are available upon reasonable request from IG isabelle.gendre@adeca-alsace.frASGEAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal EndoscopyBCSPBowel cancer screening programmeCIconfidence intervalCRCcolorectal cancerEMRendoscopic mucosal resectionERendoscopic resectionESDendoscopic submucosal dissectionESGEEuropean Society for Gastrointestinal EndoscopFITfaecal immunochemical testgFOBTguaiac-based faecal occult blood testLNMlymph node metastasisLPlarge polypNPVnegative predictive valuePPVpositive predictive valueSDstandard deviation