PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Jaya, Ziningi N. AU - Mapanga, Witness AU - Ogunsakin, Ropo AU - Mashamba-Thompson, Tivani P TI - Young Women’s Preferences for a Self-Sampling Intervention to Diagnose Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Discrete Choice Experiment AID - 10.1101/2024.06.03.24308383 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.06.03.24308383 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/03/2024.06.03.24308383.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/03/2024.06.03.24308383.full AB - The high rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in young women in South Africa warrant the use of innovative interventions like self-sampling to diagnose both symptomatic and asymptomatic infections. Although proven as an effective measure in the fight against STIs, there is limited evidence on the preferred attributes of this intervention. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to understand young women’s preferred attributes for self-sampling which included accessibility and convenience of self-sampling kits, education and normalisation, confidentiality and communication of results, self-sampling collection method, cost, and youth-friendliness as developed using a nominal group technique. A total of 206 young women aged between 18 – 24 years residing in underserved communities in Ethekwini Metropolitan Municipality, in KwaZulu-Natal, participated in the study. Study findings highlighted young women’s preference for enhanced accessibility, comprehensive education on STIs and self-sampling, confidential result communication, autonomy in self-collection method selection, and youth-friendly healthcare environments. The design of effective self-sampling interventions that promote STI testing thereby reducing transmission of infection, should address these preferences. Policymakers and healthcare providers should engage youth in the design of such initiatives and promote patient-centred healthcare to meet their preferences and improve STI-related health outcomes in this population.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of Pretoria Research Ethics Committee (reference number 136:2022) and the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Health (reference number KZ_202208_005) prior to data collection. All participants signed informed consent prior to data collection.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.