RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 transmission on contacts and mixing patterns in the Netherlands: repeated cross-sectional surveys
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.18.20101501
DO 10.1101/2020.05.18.20101501
A1 Backer, Jantien A.
A1 Mollema, Liesbeth
A1 Klinkenberg, Don
A1 van der Klis, Fiona
A1 Melker, Hester de
A1 van den Hof, Susan
A1 Wallinga, Jacco
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/20/2020.05.18.20101501.abstract
AB Background During the current pandemic of coronavirus (COVID-19) many countries have taken drastic measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV2. The measures often include physical distancing that aims to reduce the number of contacts in the population. Little is known about the actual reduction in number of contacts as a consequence of physical distancing measures.Methods In the Netherlands, a cross-sectional survey was carried out in 2016/2017 in which 8179 participants retrospectively reported the number, age and gender of different persons they had contacted (spoken to in person or touched) during the previous day. The survey was repeated among 2830 of the original participants, using the same questionnaire, in March and April 2020 after physical distancing measures had been implemented.Results The average number of contacts in the community was reduced from on average 12.5 (interquartile range: 2–17) to 3.7 (interquartile range: 0–4) different persons per participant, a reduction of 71% (95% confidence interval: 71–71). The reduction in the number of community contacts was highest for children and adolescents (between 5 and 20 years) and smallest for elderly persons of 80 years and older. The reduction in the effective number of total contacts, measured as the largest eigenvalue of the matrix with community and household contacts, was 62% (95% confidence interval: 48 – 72).Conclusion The substantial reduction in contacts has contributed greatly in halting the COVID-19 epidemic. This reduction was unevenly distributed over age groups, household sizes and occupations. These findings offer guidance for the lifting of age-group targeted measures.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was financed by the Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme - project EpiPose (grant agreement number 101003688).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData of contact matrices shown in Fig. 3 are available as tab separated file (S1_contact_matrices.tsv).