RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The Impact of Conventional Stroke Risk Factors on Early and Late Onset Ischemic Stroke: a Mendelian Randomization Study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.05.31.24308308
DO 10.1101/2024.05.31.24308308
A1 Nguyen, Kevin TK
A1 Xu, Huichun
A1 Gaynor, Brady
A1 Adebamowo, Sally N.
A1 McArdle, Patrick F.
A1 O’Connor, Tim
A1 Worrall, Bradford
A1 Malik, Rainer
A1 Boncoraglio, Giorgio B.
A1 Zand, Ramin
A1 Kittner, Steven J.
A1 Mitchell, Braxton D.
A1 
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/02/2024.05.31.24308308.abstract
AB Objective Although stroke incidence is decreasing in older ages, it is increasing in young adults. While these divergent trends in stroke incidence are at least partially attributable to diverging prevalence trends in stoke risk factors, age-dependent differences in the impact of stroke risk factors on stroke may also contribute. To address this issue, we utilized Mendelian Randomization (MR) to assess differences in the association of stroke risk factors between early onset ischemic stroke (EOS) and late onset ischemic stroke (LOS).Methods We employed a two-sample MR design with inverse variance weighting as the primary method of analysis. Using large publicly available genome-wide association summary results, we calculated MR estimates for conventional stroke risk factors (body mass index, total, HDL-and LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, type 2 diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and smoking) in EOS cases (onset 18-59 years, n = 6,728) and controls from the Early Onset Stroke Consortium and in LOS cases (onset ≥ 60 years, n = 9,272) and controls from the Stroke Genetics Network. We then compared odds ratios between EOS and LOS, stratified by TOAST subtypes, to determine if any differences observed between effect sizes could be attributed to differences in the distribution of stroke subtypes.Results EOS was significantly associated with all risk factors except for total cholesterol levels, and LOS was associated with all risk factors except for triglyceride and total cholesterol levels. The associations of BMI, DBP, SBP, and HDL-cholesterol were significantly stronger in EOS than LOS (all p < 0.004). The differential distribution of stroke subtypes could not explain the difference in effect size observed between EOS and LOS.Conclusion These results suggest that interventions targeted at lowering body mass index and blood pressure may be particularly important for reducing stroke risk in young adults.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementPartial funding was provided by NIH grants R01 NS100178, R01 NS105150, and P30 AG028747, and U01HG011717. Kevin Nguyen was supported by a T32 AG000262 Epidemiology of Aging grant and R01 NS114045 CNV And Stroke (CaNVAS). Dr. Xu was supported by the AHA (Grant 19CDA34760258).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not applicable, using secondary dataI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes