RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Automated Prediction of Ischemic Brain Tissue Fate from Multi-Phase CT-Angiography in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Machine Learning
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.14.20101014
DO 10.1101/2020.05.14.20101014
A1 Qiu, Wu
A1 Kuang, Hulin
A1 Ospel, Johanna M.
A1 Hill, Michael D
A1 Demchuk, Andrew M
A1 Goyal, Mayank
A1 Menon, Bijoy K
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/19/2020.05.14.20101014.abstract
AB Background and objective Multiphase CT-Angiography (mCTA) provides time variant images of the pial vasculature supplying brain in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Here, we develop and test a machine learning (ML) technique that predicts infarct, penumbra and tissue perfusion from mCTA source images.Methods 284 patients with AIS were included from the Prove-IT study. All patients had non-contrast CT, mCTA and CTP imaging at baseline and follow up MRI/NCCT imaging. Of the 284 patient images, 140 patient images were randomly selected to train and validate three ML models to predict infarct, penumbra, and perfusion parameter on CTP, respectively. The remaining unseen 144 patient images independent of the derivation cohort were used to test the derived ML models. The predicted infarct, penumbra, and perfusion volume from ML models was spatially and volumetrically compared to manually contoured follow up infarct and time-dependent Tmax thresholded volume (CTP volume), using Bland-Altman plots, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).Results Within the test cohort, Bland–Altman plots showed that the mean difference between the mCTA predicted infarct and follow up infarct was 21.7 mL (limit of agreement (LoA): –41.0 to 84.3mL) in the 100 patients who had acute reperfusion (mTICI 2b/2c/3), and 3.4mL (LoA: –66 to 72.9mL) in the 44 patients who did not achieve reperfusion (mTICI 0/1). Amongst reperfused subjects, CCC was 0.4 [95%CI: 0.15–0.55, P<.01] and ICC 0.42 [95% CI: 0.18–0.50, P<.01]; in non-reperfused subjects CCC was 0.52 [95%CI: 0.2–0.6, P<.001] and ICC 0.6 [95% CI: 0.37–0.76, P<.001]. No difference was observed between the mCTA and CTP predicted infarct volume for the overall test cohort (P =.67).Conclusion Multiphase CT Angiography is able to predict infarct, penumbra and tissue perfusion, comparable to CT perfusion imaging.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study is funded through an operating grant from the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) and Alberta Innovate: Health Solution (AIHS).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is not publicly available.