RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Did England’s Teenage Pregnancy Strategy reduce pregnancy rates in England? A Natural Experiment study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.12.20099002
DO 10.1101/2020.05.12.20099002
A1 Baxter, Andrew J
A1 Dundas, Ruth
A1 Popham, Frank
A1 Craig, Peter
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/19/2020.05.12.20099002.abstract
AB Objective To re-evaluate the impact of England’s Teenage Pregnancy Strategy (1999 to 2010) on pregnancy and birth rates. Hailed as a unique, nation-wide, comprehensive, evidence-based intervention, the strategy has been promoted as a reproducible model for other countries with high teenage pregnancy rates.Design Controlled interrupted time series and synthetic control analyses using routinely collected data on births and abortions in 16 countries.Setting The Strategy was published in July 1999 and implemented from 2000-2010, with increased investment in areas with higher rates of under-18 pregnancies from 2006 onwards.Participants Women aged under 20 living in England during the intervention period were considered to be the target population. Women in Scotland and Wales were the control population in our interrupted time series analyses. Women from European and English-speaking high-income countries were the control population in our synthetic control analyses.Main outcome measures The pregnancy rate among women aged under-18 was our primary outcome, as this was the target of the Strategy. We used under-18 births and under-20 pregnancies as secondary outcomes.Results In the controlled interrupted time series analyses, trends in rates of teenage pregnancy in England were similar to Scotland (0.08 fewer pregnancies per 1,000 women per year in England; −0.74 to 0.59) and Wales (0.14 more pregnancies per 1,000 women per year in England; −0.48 to 0.76). In synthetic control analyses, under-18 birth rates were very similar in England and the synthetic control. Under-20 pregnancy rates were marginally higher in England than in the synthetic control. Placebo testing and other sensitivity analyses supported the finding of little observable effect.Conclusion Although teenage pregnancies and births in England fell following implementation of the Teenage Pregnancy Strategy, comparisons with other countries suggest the strategy had little, if any, effect. This raises doubts about whether the strategy should be used as a model for future public health interventions in England or in other countries aiming to reduce teenage pregnancy.The protocol for the analysis was published online at https://osf.io/tdbr8/SUMMARY BOX What is already known on this topic:Teenage pregnancy is associated with numerous health risks, and efforts to reduce rates of pregnancy may lead to improved health outcomesThe Teenage Pregnancy Strategy was launched in 1999 with the goal of reducing teenage pregnancies in EnglandInitial observations showed a drop in rate across the strategy period; this has been interpreted as demonstrating the success of the intervention.What this study adds:Our study suggests there was little or no effect of the strategy, and that the rapid decline in rates would have occurred without the intervention, in line with similar countries.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/tdbr8/ Funding StatementAB, RD, FP and PC are funded by the Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12017/13 and MC_UU_12017/15) and the Chief Scientist Office (SPHSU13 and SPHSU15). AB is also funded by a University of Glasgow College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences PhD studentship.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll code used for data cleaning and analysis is available online at https://github.com/andrewbaxter439/teen-preg-project (archived at https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3761903) and https://github.com/andrewbaxter439/ITS_shinyapp (archived at https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3690804). Data sets of calculated outcomes and predictors for countries are included; raw data used to calculate these is available from respective websites, detailed at these repositories. https://osf.io/8u9jp/ https://github.com/andrewbaxter439/ITS_shinyapp https://github.com/andrewbaxter439/teen-preg-project