PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Ren, Chenchen AU - Zeng, Xianxu AU - Shi, Zhongna AU - Wang, Chunyan AU - Wang, Huifen AU - Wang, Xiuqin AU - Zhang, Baoping AU - Jiang, Zhaoning AU - Ma, Huan AU - Hu, Hao AU - Piao, Haozhe AU - Zhang, Xiaoan AU - Wang, Baojin TI - Multi-center Clinical Study Using Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluation of Cervical Lesions In-vivo AID - 10.1101/2020.05.12.20098830 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.05.12.20098830 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/18/2020.05.12.20098830.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/18/2020.05.12.20098830.full AB - Objective In this prospective study of an in-vivo cervical examination using optical coherence tomography (OCT), we evaluated the diagnostic value of non-invasive and real-time OCT in cervical precancerous lesions and cancer diagnosis, and determined the characteristics of OCT images.Methods 733 patients from 5 Chinese hospitals were inspected with OCT and colposcopy-directed biopsy. The OCT images were compared with the histological sections to find out the characteristics of various categories of lesions. The OCT images were also interpreted by 3 investigators to make a 2-class classification, and the results were compared against the pathological results.Results Various structures of the cervical tissue were clearly observed in OCT images, which matched well with the corresponding histological sections. The OCT diagnosis results delivered a sensitivity of 87.0% (95% confidence interval, CI, 82.2%-90.7%), a specificity of 84.1% (95% CI, 80.3%-87.2%), and an overall accuracy of 85.1%.Conclusion Both good consistency of OCT images and histological images and satisfactory diagnosis results were provided by OCT. Due to its features of non-invasion, real-time, and accuracy, OCT is valuable for the in-vivo evaluation of cervical lesions and has the potential to be one of the routine cervical diagnosis methods.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis study used only inspection results, but no intervention to human was involved. It is not considered to be a clinical trial.Funding StatementThis work is partially supported by the Henan Province medical science and technology research program co-sponsored by Henan province and the Ministry of Education (No. SBGJ2018050).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesSome or all data used in the manuscript are available from the corresponding author by request.