RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The differential impact of physical distancing strategies on social contacts relevant for the spread of COVID-19
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.15.20102657
DO 10.1101/2020.05.15.20102657
A1 Del Fava, Emanuele
A1 Cimentada, Jorge
A1 Perrotta, Daniela
A1 Grow, André
A1 Rampazzo, Francesco
A1 Gil-Clavel, Sofia
A1 Zagheni, Emilio
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/18/2020.05.15.20102657.abstract
AB Physical distancing measures are intended to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. However, the impact these measures have on social contact and disease transmission patterns remains unclear. We ran the first comparative contact survey (N = 53,708) across eight countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, United States) for the period March 13-April 13, 2020. Our results show that social contact numbers mainly decreased after governments issued physical distancing guidelines rather than after announcing national lockdown measures. Compared to pre-COVID levels, social contact numbers decreased by 48%-85% across countries. Except in Italy, these reductions were smaller than those observed in Wuhan (China). However, they sufficed to bring the R0below one in almost every context considered. Finally, in all countries studied, the numbers of contacts decreased more rapidly among older people than among younger people, indicating higher levels of protection for groups at greater risk.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded through the support of the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, which is part of the Max Planck Society.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll the primary data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are currently stored in a secure and protected server at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, and are not publicly available in order to comply with data protection regulations in Germany, and to preserve the privacy of study participants. Replication data and R/Stata code for all our findings will be made available in the future once the appropriate privacy measures have been implemented to avoid identification of individuals in the microdata.