PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Alves Simões-Neto, Eudes AU - Santos, Daniel Wagner de Castro Lima AU - Bomfim, Maria Rosa Quaresma AU - Costa, Jackson Maurício Lopes AU - Simões, Amanda Ferreira AU - Vasconcelos, Lucas Dias AU - Sodré, Domingos Carvalho AU - Costa, Ana Cleide Mineu AU - Dumont, Samuel Vieira Rodrigues AU - Melo, Bruna de Oliveira de AU - de Azevedo, Conceição de Maria Pedrozo e Silva TI - An outbreak of Chagas disease through oral transmission: 115 years after discovery by Carlos Chagas, the disease is still hard to manage AID - 10.1101/2024.05.24.24307628 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.05.24.24307628 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/24/2024.05.24.24307628.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/24/2024.05.24.24307628.full AB - Background Orally transmitted acute Chagas disease (ACD) mostly affects low-visibility and low-income individuals, mainly in tropical and subtropical zones. However, even more than 100 years after Carlos Chagas’ discovery, several difficulties in managing ACD are still faced. Ita expansion to other, non-endemic areas through globalization processes has transformed it into a global health problem.Methodology and findings This report addresses an outbreak of 39 cases of ACD due to oral transmission. A clinical-epidemiological investigation with an entomological search was performed. Laboratory criteria (positive peripheral blood smear (PBS), seroconversion of IgG and 2x increase in IgG titer) and clinical-epidemiological criteria (clinical findings, epidemiological exposure and at least one positive IgG) were used for diagnoses. In-house conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on 33 samples. All patients were treated with benznidazole. After 4.5 years, IgG was investigated in 26 individuals. Their mean age was 33.6 years, with no difference in gender distribution; the mean incubation period was 13.8 days and mean time between symptom onset and treatment was 16.6 days. The most frequent symptoms were fever and lymphadenopathy (90%). For 66.6%, laboratory criteria yielded the diagnosis and for 23%, clinical-epidemiological criteria, while 10.2% showed negative tests but were treated due to high clinical suspicion. Test positivity rates: PBS 69.7%; serology 91.4%; PCR 100%. There were no deaths. Serological cure was achieved for 34.6% and decreased IgG titers for 15.3%.Conclusions and significance We present all the barriers encountered in managing real-life situations: vulnerability of the population; dependence on old diagnostic techniques; lack of standardization of molecular biology techniques; and few therapeutic options. We demonstrated the importance of rapid surveillance action with early treatment, such that this outbreak did not give rise to deaths. We also propose that conventional PCR should become standardized within the diagnostic routine.AUTHOR SUMMARY In this study we present an outbreak of orally transmitted acute Chagas disease (ACD), a neglected tropical disease. The source of transmission was bacaba juice served at a celebration held in a quilombola community and 39 individuals were affected. The focus of this study was clinical-epidemiological investigation and diagnostic tools. There were no deaths due to this event, probably because of the quick action of the surveillance team and the early start of treatment. We show all the difficulties facing a real-life situation (vulnerability of population affected, weaknesses regarding good food safety practices and obstacles to following what guidelines recommend), discuss the performance and executability of the diagnostic method used and address the global threat that Chagas disease may pose. Furthermore, we propose that the polymerase chain reaction should become standardized in diagnosing acute disease, given that this was the only method with 100% positivity, even among patients whose other tests were all negative.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Formal written consent was obtained from al the patients and the parent/guardian in case of children. Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the University Hospital Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Maranhao, through protocol number 4.357.642.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript