RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Minding the margins: Evaluating the impact of COVID-19 among Latinx and Black communities with optimal qualitative serological assessment tools
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.05.23.24307817
DO 10.1101/2024.05.23.24307817
A1 Binder, Raquel A.
A1 Matta, Angela M.
A1 Forconi, Catherine S.
A1 Oduor, Cliff I.
A1 Bedekar, Prajakta
A1 Patrone, Paul N.
A1 Kearsley, Anthony J.
A1 Odwar, Boaz
A1 Batista, Jennifer
A1 Forrester, Sarah N.
A1 Leftwich, Heidi K.
A1 Cavacini, Lisa A.
A1 Moormann, Ann M.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/24/2024.05.23.24307817.abstract
AB COVID-19 disproportionately affected minorities, while research barriers to engage underserved communities persist. Serological studies reveal infection and vaccination histories within these communities, however lack of consensus on downstream evaluation methods impede meta-analyses and dampen the broader public health impact. To reveal the impact of COVID-19 and vaccine uptake among diverse communities and to develop rigorous serological downstream evaluation methods, we engaged racial and ethnic minorities in Massachusetts in a cross-sectional study (April - July 2022), screened blood and saliva for SARS-CoV-2 and human endemic coronavirus (hCoV) antibodies by bead-based multiplex assay and point-of-care (POC) test and developed across-plate normalization and classification boundary methods for optimal qualitative serological assessments. Among 290 participants, 91.4 % reported receiving at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, while 41.7 % reported past SARS-CoV-2 infections, which was confirmed by POC- and multiplex-based saliva and blood IgG seroprevalences. We found significant differences in antigen-specific IgA and IgG antibody outcomes and indication of cross-reactivity with hCoV OC43. Finally, 26.5 % of participants reported lingering COVID-19 symptoms, mostly middle-aged Latinas. Hence, prolonged COVID-19 symptoms were common among our underserved population and require public health attention, despite high COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Saliva served as a less-invasive sample-type for IgG-based serosurveys and hCoV cross-reactivity needed to be evaluated for reliable SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey results. Using the developed rigorous downstream qualitative serological assessment methods will help standardize serosurvey outcomes and meta-analyses for future serosurveys beyond SARS-CoV-2.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported through the National Institutes of Health, NCI Serological Sciences Network (U01 CA261276), UMass Chan COVID-19 pandemic research fund, MassCPR Evergrande Award, and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant KL2-TR001455. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This cross-sectional study was approved by the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (UMass Chan) Institutional Review Board (IRB Docket # H00023083).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors