RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Upper arm length along with mid-upper arm circumference to enhance wasting prevalence estimation and diagnosis: sensitivity and specificity in 6 to 59 month-old children
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.12.20089433
DO 10.1101/2020.05.12.20089433
A1 Barro, Mouhamed
A1 Baro, Mohamed Daouda
A1 Cisse, Djibril
A1 Zagre, Noel
A1 Ba, Thierno
A1 Neff-Baro, Shanti
A1 Diagana, Yacouba
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/18/2020.05.12.20089433.abstract
AB Objective To evaluate the added value of the use of upper arm length (UAL) along with MUAC (mid-upper arm circumference) to diagnose and estimate the prevalence of wasting in comparison to current WHO standard and others MUAC based methods.Design We included UAL to usual anthropometric measurements during a Mauritanian national 6-59-month-old cross-sectional nutritional survey. Children were classified into 3 groups UALG1, UALG2 and UALG3 according to the following UAL limits: ≤ 150 mm, 151-180, and > 180mm respectively. We used a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve to determine the best MUAC cut-off for each group with weight-for-height Z score as a reference standard. We compared the wasting prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity, of all diagnostic methods.Findings In total, 12 619 children were included in the study. Wasting prevalence was 16.1%, 5.0% and 12.5% when diagnosed by WHZ < −2, MUAC < 125 mm and MUAC-UALG methods respectively. Using the MUAC-UALG method increased the sensitivity for wasting diagnosis from 17.98 % with MUAC < 125 mm to 39.43% with MUAC-UALG. The specificity decreased from 97.49% with MUAC < 125 to 92.71% with MUAC-UALG. With MUAC-height Z score and MUAC < 138 mm, sensitivity was 26.04% and 69.76%and specificity were 97.40%and 75.64% respectively.Conclusion This alternative method using MUAC measuring tape to measure UAL increases the wasting diagnosis accuracy and allows for a better estimation of wasting prevalence. This method could be used as a potential alternative method for quick surveys in emergency settings such as Corona virus disease 2019 context.Competing Interest StatementOne author, Mouhamed BARRO works now for Nutriset S.A.S France but this work started before he joined the company and is independent to his activity at the company.Clinical TrialThis study was not registered because it was not a real intervention study, since (except the upper arm length which was added), all data were collected from an annual routine nutritional survey without any protocol modification. A steering and ethics committee has been set up by the Ministry of Health and UNICEF to validate the protocol of the survey.Funding StatementNo author has received any specific funding for this study.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData could be shared upon a reasonable request after publication.