PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - King, Christopher R AU - Fritz, Bradley A. AU - Gregory, Stephen H. AU - Budelier, Thaddeus P. AU - Ben Abdallah, Arbi AU - Kronzer, Alex AU - Helsten, Daniel L. AU - Torres, Brian AU - McKinnon, Sherry L. AU - Tripathi, Sandhya AU - Abdelhack, Mohamed AU - Goswami, Shreya AU - Montes de Oca, Arianna AU - Mehta, Divya AU - Valdez, Miguel A. AU - Karanikolas, Evangelos AU - Higo, Omokhaye AU - Kerby, Paul AU - Henrichs, Bernadette AU - Wildes, Troy S. AU - Politi, Mary C. AU - Abraham, Joanna AU - Avidan, Michael S. AU - Kannampallil, Thomas AU - , TI - Effect of Telemedicine Support for Intraoperative Anaesthesia Care on Postoperative Outcomes: The TECTONICS Randomised Clinical Trial AID - 10.1101/2024.05.21.24307593 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.05.21.24307593 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/23/2024.05.21.24307593.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/23/2024.05.21.24307593.full AB - Background Novel applications of telemedicine can improve care quality and patient outcomes. Telemedicine for intraoperative decision support has not been rigorously studied.Methods This single centre randomised clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03923699) of unselected adult surgical patients was conducted between July 1, 2019 and January 31, 2023. Patients received usual care or decision support from a telemedicine service, the Anesthesiology Control Tower (ACT). The ACT provided real-time recommendations to intraoperative anaesthesia clinicians based on case reviews, machine-learning forecasting, and physiologic alerts. ORs were randomised 1:1. Co-primary outcomes of 30-day all-cause mortality, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury (AKI), and delirium were analysed as intention-to-treat.Results The trial completed planned enrolment with 71927 surgeries (35956 ACT; 35971 usual care). After multiple testing correction, there was no significant effect of the ACT vs. usual care on 30-day mortality [641/35956 (1.8%) vs 638/35971 (1.8%), risk difference 0.0% (95% CI −0.2% to 0.3%), p=0.96], respiratory failure [1089/34613 (3.1%) vs 1112/34619 (3.2%), risk difference −0.1% (95% CI −0.4% to 0.3%), p=0.96], AKI [2357/33897 (7%) vs 2391/33795 (7.1%), risk difference −0.1% (−0.6% to 0.4%), p=0.96], or delirium [1283/3928 (32.7%) vs 1279/3989 (32.1%), risk difference 0.6% (−2.0% to 3.2%), p=0.96]. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes or in sensitivity analyses.Conclusions In this large RCT of a novel application of telemedicine-based remote monitoring and decision support using real-time alerts and case reviews, we found no significant differences in postoperative outcomes. Large-scale intraoperative telemedicine is feasible, and we suggest future avenues where it may be impactful.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT03923699Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research (R01 NR017916 to Dr. Avidan) and departmental funding from Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine. The investigators were also supported by National Institutes of Health training awards TR002346 (Dr King) and T32GM108539 (Drs King and Fritz) and funding from the Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research (MRT08152020 to Dr Fritz). The funding organization(s) had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of Washington University in St Louis gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe Washington University Human Research Protection Office did not permit sharing of patient level data due to enrolment with a waiver of consent. Summary data is available at the clinicaltrials.gov registration.