RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Navigating the chaos of psychedelic fMRI brain-entropy via multi-metric evaluations of acute psilocybin effects
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.07.03.23292164
DO 10.1101/2023.07.03.23292164
A1 McCulloch, Drummond E-Wen
A1 Olsen, Anders Stevnhoved
A1 Ozenne, Brice
A1 Stenbæk, Dea Siggaard
A1 Armand, Sophia
A1 Madsen, Martin Korsbak
A1 Knudsen, Gitte Moos
A1 Fisher, Patrick MacDonald
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/22/2023.07.03.23292164.abstract
AB A prominent theory of psychedelics is that they increase brain entropy. Twelve studies have evaluated psychedelic effects on fMRI brain entropy quantifications, no findings have been replicated. Here we evaluated these metrics in an independent 28-participant healthy cohort with 121 pre- and post-psilocybin fMRI scans. We assessed relations between brain entropy and plasma psilocin, brain serotonin 2A receptor occupancy, and a subjective drug intensity rating using linear mixed-effects models. We observed significant positive associations for Shannon entropy of path-length, instantaneous correlation distributions, and divergent associations of sample entropy at varying time-scales. We did not observe significant effects for 8 of 13 entropy metrics. Brain entropy quantifications showed limited inter-measure correlations. Our observations support a nuanced acute psychedelic effect on brain entropy, underscoring the need for replication and that these metrics do not reflect a singular construct. Our findings highlight candidate brain entropy metrics that may mediate clinical effects of psychedelics.Competing Interest StatementDEWM salary is supported by an unrestricted grant from COMPASS Pathways who have no involvement in the preparation or conception of this manuscript or related data collection. MKM has received an honorarium as a speaker for H. Lundbeck. GMK has served as a consultant for Sanos, Gilgamesh, Onsero, Pangea, Abbvie, PureHealthTech, and has received honoraria as speaker for H. Lundbeck and Sage TherapeuticsClinical TrialNCT03289949Clinical Protocols https://aspredicted.org/bw8y7.pdf Funding StatementThe work was supported by Innovation Fund Denmark (grant number 4108 –00004B), Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant number 6110 –00518B), and Ester M. og Konrad Kristian Sigurdssons Dyrevaernsfond (grant number 850–22–55,166–17–LNG). MKM was supported through a stipend from Rigshospitalets Research Council (grant number R130–A5324). BO has received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska –Curie grant agreement No 746,850. DEM salary is supported by COMPASS Pathways Ltd. Funding agencies did not impact the study and played no role in manuscript preparation and submission.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the capital region of Copenhagen (H-16026898) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT no.: 2016-004000-61). The study was registered at clincaltrials.gov (NCT03289949).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesWe shared relevant analysis scripts with original authors, hoping to ensure as much as possible that our computations aligned with original reports; we are thankful for the feedback we received. All functions used to derive entropy estimates from pre-processed data have been compiled into the “Copenhagen Brain Entropy Toolbox” (CopBET), a Matlab-based toolbox that can be found here: https://github.com/anders-s-olsen/CopBET. The permutation testing code is also available here. Code for other statistical analyses and figures can be made available upon request. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request to the CIMBI database 82. https://github.com/anders-s-olsen/CopBET