RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.05.19.24307604
DO 10.1101/2024.05.19.24307604
A1 Vincent-Genod, Dominique
A1 Roche, Sylvain
A1 Barrière, Aurélie
A1 de Lattre, Capucine
A1 Tinat, Marie
A1 Venema, Eelke
A1 Lagrange, Emmeline
A1 de Souza, Adriana Gomes Lisboa
A1 Thomann, Guillaume
A1 Coton, Justine
A1 Gautheron, Vincent
A1 Féasson, Léonard
A1 Rippert, Pascal
A1 Vuillerot, Carole
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/20/2024.05.19.24307604.abstract
AB Purpose Among the 32 items of the Motor Function Measure scale, 3 concern the assessment of hand function on a paper-based support. Their characteristics make it possible to envisage the use of a tablet instead of the original paper-based support for their completion. This would then make it possible to automate the score to reduce intra- and inter-individual variability.The main objective of the present study was to validate the digital completion of items 18, 19, and 22 by measuring the agreement of the scores obtained using a digital tablet with those obtained using the original paper-based support in children and adults with various neuromuscular diseases (NMD). The secondary objective is to calibrate an algorithm for the automatic items scoring.Design Prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study.Methods Ninety-eight subjects aged 5 to 60 years with a confirmed NMD completed MFM items 18, 19, and 22 both on a paper support and a digital tablet.Results The median age of included subjects was 16.2 years. Agreement between scores as assessed using the weighted Kappa coefficient was almost perfect for the scores of items 18 and 22 (K=0.93, and 0.95, respectively) and substantial for item 19 (K=0.70). In all cases of disagreement, the difference was of 1 point. The most frequent disagreement concerned item 19; mainly in the direction of a scoring of 1 point less on the tablet. An automatic analysis algorithm was tested on 82 recordings to suggest improvements.Conclusion The switch from original paper-based support to the tablet results in minimal and acceptable differences, and maintains a valid and reproducible measure of the 3 items. The developed algorithm for automatic scoring appears feasible with the perspective to include them in a digital application that will make it easier to monitor patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialID: NCT03465358Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval was obtained from the regional review board (Comité éthique de Protection des Personnes du Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer de France).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe de-identified research data supporting this publication could be obtained on request to the corresponding author