RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Causes of variation in epigenetic aging across the lifespan
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.10.20097030
DO 10.1101/2020.05.10.20097030
A1 Li, Shuai
A1 Nguyen, Tuong L
A1 Wong, Ee Ming
A1 Dugué, Pierre-Antoine
A1 Dite, Gillian S
A1 Armstrong, Nicola J
A1 Craig, Jeffrey M
A1 Mather, Karen A
A1 Sachdev, Perminder S
A1 Saffery, Richard
A1 Sung, Joohon
A1 Tan, Qihua
A1 Thalamuthu, Anbupalam
A1 Milne, Roger L
A1 Giles, Graham G
A1 Southey, Melissa C
A1 Hopper, John L
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/15/2020.05.10.20097030.abstract
AB Background DNA methylation-based biological age (DNAm age) is potentially an important biomarker for adult health. Studies in specific age ranges have found widely varying results about its causes of variation. We investigated these causes across the lifespan.Methods We pooled genome-wide DNA methylation data for 4,217 people aged 0-92 years from 1,871 families. DNAm age was calculated using the Horvath epigenetic clock. We estimated familial correlations in DNAm age for monozygotic (MZ) twin, dizygotic (DZ) twin, sibling, parent-offspring, and spouse pairs by cohabitation status. Genetic and environmental variance component models were fitted and compared.Results Twin pair correlations were −0.12 to 0.18 around birth, not different from zero (all P>0.29). For all pairs of relatives, their correlations increased with time spent living together (all P<0.02) at different rates (MZ>DZ and siblings>parent-offspring; P<0.001) and decreased with time spent living apart (P=0.02) at similar rates. These correlation patterns were best explained by cohabitation-dependent shared environmental factors, the effects of which were 1.41 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 1.66) times greater for MZ pairs than for DZ and sibling pairs, and the latter were 2.03 (95% CI, 1.13 to 9.47) times greater than for parent-offspring pairs. Genetic factors explained 13% (95% CI, −10% to 35%) of variation (P=0.27).Conclusion Variation in DNAm age is mostly caused by environmental factors, including those shared to different extents by relatives while living together and whose effects persist into old age. The equal environment assumption of the classic twin study might not hold for epigenetic aging.Competing Interest StatementGSD receives grant money from Genetic Technologies Ltd. for work that is unrelated to the current paper.Funding StatementThis work was supported by grants from the Victorian Cancer Agency (grant number ECRF19020), Cancer Council Victoria (grant number 180626), and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC, grant number 057873).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe following datasets are accessed from Gene Expression Omnibus: PETS 27K (GSE36642), PETS 450K (GSE42700), BSGS (GSE56105), E-Risk (GSE105018), DTR (GSE61496), TwinsUK (GSE58045) and LSDAT (GSE73115). The MuTHER dataset was assessed from ArrayExpress with the number E-MTAB-1866.