PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - López-Plaza, Bricia AU - Álvarez-Mercado, Ana Isabel AU - Arcos-Castellanos, Lucía AU - Plaza-Diaz, Julio AU - Ruiz-Ojeda, Francisco Javier AU - Brandimonte-Hernández, Marco AU - Feliú-Batlle, Jaime AU - Hummel, Thomas AU - Gil, Ángel AU - Milla, Samara Palma TI - Efficacy and Safety of Habitual Consumption of a Food Supplement Containing Miraculin in Malnourished Cancer Patients: the CLINMIR Pilot Study AID - 10.1101/2024.05.15.24307453 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.05.15.24307453 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/16/2024.05.15.24307453.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/16/2024.05.15.24307453.full AB - Taste disorders (TDs) are common among systemically treated cancer patients and negatively impact their nutritional status and quality of life. A food supplement containing the natural taste-modifying protein miraculin (DMB®) has emerged as a possible alternative treatment for TDs. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of habitual DMB consumption in malnourished cancer patients undergoing active treatment. An exploratory clinical trial was carried out in which 31 cancer patients were randomized into three arms [standard dose of DMB (150 mg DMB/tablet), high dose of DMB (300 mg DMB/tablet) or placebo (300 mg freeze-dried strawberry)] for three months. Patients consumed an intervention DMB tablet or placebo before each main meal. Throughout the five main visits, electrochemical taste perception, nutritional status, dietary intake, quality of life and the fatty acid profile of erythrocytes were evaluated. Patients consuming a standard dose of DMB exhibited improved taste acuity over time (% change right/left side: ‒52.8 ± 38.5 / ‒58.7 ± 69.2%) and salty taste perception (2.29 ± 1.25 vs. high dose: 2.17 ± 1.84 vs. placebo: 1.57 ± 1.51 points, p < 0.05). They also had higher energy intake (p = 0.075) and covered better energy expenditure (107 ± 19%). The quality of life evaluated by symptom scales improved in patients receiving the standard dose of DMB (constipation, p = 0.048). The levels of arachidonic (13.1 ± 1.8; 14.0 ± 2.8, 12.0 ± 2.0%; p = 0.004) and do-cosahexaenoic (4.4 ± 1.7; 4.1 ± 1.0; 3.9 ± 1.6%; p = 0.014) acids in erythrocytes increased over time after DMB intake. The standard dose of DMB increased fat‒free mass vs. placebo (47.4 ± 9.3 vs. 44.1 ± 4.7 kg, p = 0.007). Importantly, habitual patients with DMB did not experience any adverse events, and metabolic parameters remained stable and within normal ranges. In conclusion, habitual consumption of a standard 150 mg dose of DMB improves electrochemical food perception, nutritional status (energy intake, fat quantity and quality, fat-free mass) and quality of life in malnourished cancer patients receiving antineoplastic treatment. Additionally, DMB consumption appears to be safe, with no changes in major biochemical parameters associated with health status. The clinical trial was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05486260).Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT05486260Funding StatementThis study is funded by Medicinal Gardens S.L. through the Center for Industrial Technological Development (CDTI), Cervera Transfer R&D Projects. Ref. IDI-20210622. (Science and Education Ministry, Spain).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Universitario La Paz (protocol code 6164 and Jun 23rd 2022 date of approval).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesInformed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.