PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Wong, Gretel Jianlin AU - Lau, Jerrald AU - Tan, Ker-Kan TI - The Effect of a Simple Phone Call Intervention on FIT-Positive Individuals: An Exploratory Study AID - 10.1101/2020.05.11.20097899 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.05.11.20097899 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/14/2020.05.11.20097899.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/14/2020.05.11.20097899.full AB - Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to improve patient outcomes. A widely utilised preliminary screening tool is the Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT). However, follow-up rates after a positive FIT result remain suboptimal. In order to improve FIT-positive individuals’ compliance to follow-up consultation and to elucidate barriers to action, a simple telephone intervention based on the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) was conducted. Ninety-two FIT-positive individuals who had previously rejected follow-up consultation were interviewed by the study team. Individuals reported barriers to action such as the denial of a positive FIT result and a lack of knowledge. More than 20% of the participants who had yet to schedule follow-up consultation changed their minds after the intervention, suggesting that a simple, structured telephone call can potentially encourage more FIT-positive individuals to pursue follow-up investigation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Singapore Population Health Improvement Centre (SPHERiC) [NMRC/CG/C026/2017_NUHS]Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is a result of the MOU between SCS and the PI