RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Barriers to Cochlear Implant Uptake in Adults: A Scoping Review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.05.15.24307334
DO 10.1101/2024.05.15.24307334
A1 Neukam, Jonathan D.
A1 Kunnath, Ansley J.
A1 Patro, Ankita
A1 Gifford, René H.
A1 Haynes, David S.
A1 Moberly, Aaron C.
A1 Tamati, Terrin N.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/15/2024.05.15.24307334.abstract
AB Introduction Cochlear Implants (CIs) provide access to sound and help mitigate the negative effects of hearing loss. As a field, we are successfully implanting more adults with greater amounts of residual hearing than ever before. Despite this, utilization remains low, which is thought to arise from barriers that are both intrinsic and extrinsic. A considerable body of literature has been published in the last five years on barriers to adult CI uptake, and understanding these barriers is critical to improving access and utilization. This scoping review aims to summarize the existing literature and provide a guide to understanding barriers to adult CI uptake.Methods Inclusion criteria were limited to peer-reviewed articles involving adults, written in English, and accessible with a university library subscription. A cutoff of 20 years was used to limit the search. Barriers uncovered in this review were categorized into an ecological framework.Results The initial search revealed 2,315 items after duplicates were removed. One hundred thirty-one articles were reviewed under full-text, and 68 articles met inclusion criteria.Discussion Race, ethnicity, and reimbursement are policy and structural barriers. Public awareness and education are societal barriers. Referral and geographical challenges are forms of organizational barriers. Living context and professional support are interpersonal barriers. At the individual level sound quality, uncertainty of outcome, surgery, loss of residual hearing, and irreversibility are all barriers to CI uptake. By organizing barriers into an ecological framework, targeted interventions can be used to overcome such barriers.Competing Interest StatementRHG Serves on advisory board and as a consultant for Advanced Bionics, Cochlear, and serves as a consultant for Skylark Bio. She receives grant funding from NIH, Advanced Bionics, Cochlear, and Oticon Medical. ACM Receives research funding from Cochlear Americas. He serves as CMO and is on the Board of Directors for Otologic Technologies. TNT Receives research funding from Cochlear Americas.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Review Board of Vanderbilt University Medical Center waived ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.