PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Cadellans-Arróniz, Aïda AU - Blanco, David AU - Madruga-Parera, Marc AU - Zárate-Lozano, Victor AU - Dantony, Flora AU - Romero-Rodríguez, Daniel TI - Effectiveness of iso-inertial resistance training on eccentric and concentric power, physical performance, and risk of falls in physically active middle-older adults: a randomised controlled trial AID - 10.1101/2024.05.13.24307107 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.05.13.24307107 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/13/2024.05.13.24307107.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/13/2024.05.13.24307107.full AB - Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of iso-inertial resistance training on eccentric power compared to gravitational training in physically active middle-older adults.Methods Parallel-group, randomised controlled trial at Espai Esport Wellness Center (Granollers, Spain). Forty-four physically active adults (>57 years of age) were randomised to iso-inertial (n=21) or gravitational (n=23) training groups (R software; 1:1 ratio). Participants had to complete a 6-week training program (2 sessions/week) consisting of three exercises (forward lunge, side lunge, forward lunge with row). Primary outcome: power in the eccentric phase of each exercise evaluated with both iso-inertial and gravitational devices. Secondary outcomes: concentric power, physical performance, risk of falls. Only outcome evaluators were blinded. We used multivariate linear regression models to analyse the effect of interventions.Results Iso-inertial training showed better eccentric power gains than gravitational training for iso-inertial system evaluation, although the difference was only statistically significant for the side lunge. Forward lunge: between-group difference 3.99 W (95% CI: -3.99 to 11.33, p: 0.28); side lunge: difference 8.50 W (95% CI: 2.13 to 14.87; p: 0.01); forward lunge with row: difference 14.07 W (95% CI: -2.07 -to 30.20, p: 0.09). We observed no differences for the gravitational system evaluation nor for concentric power, physical performance, and risk of falls. The two groups improved remarkably from baseline for all outcomes.Conclusions Iso-inertial resistance training might lead to better eccentric power gains than gravitational training. Both approaches seem equally effective in improving concentric power and physical performance, and reducing the risk of falls.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06160089).WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICWHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC- Physical exercise in middle-older adults is an effective strategy to promote health and improve quality of life.- Resistance training using iso-inertial devices generates an advantage in hypertrophy, electromyographic activity or balance compared to cable-resistance training in middle-older adults.- The power at which an action is performed is considered a predictor of functional capacity, as it is associated with the execution of activities of daily living such as climbing stairs, getting up from a chair or walking.WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSWHAT THIS STUDY ADDS- The iso-inertial training system improves muscle power in the eccentric phase compared to the gravitational system, although the difference is only statistically significant for the side lunge exercise.- Iso-inertial and gravitational resistance training are equally effective in improving concentric power, and physical performance and reducing the risk of falls.- Using iso-inertial devices is recommended to evaluate power in the eccentric phase, as they may capture better the eccentric demands than gravitational devices.HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICYHOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY- Using iso-inertial devices for resistance training in middle-older adults seems a promising way to improve the power in the eccentric phase of an action.- Improving eccentric power in older adults is crucial due to its transfer to daily life activities.- Regardless of the training system, clinicians should prescribe resistance training programs to middle-older adults as these programs remarkably increase power and physical performance and reduce the risk of falls.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT06160089Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Drug Research Ethics Committee of the Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (Code: FIS-2023-03) gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData were stored and encoded in three Excel files to protect confidentiality before, during, and after the study. The first of these files contains the personal data of the participants (name and surnames, age, and sex), is accessible only to the administrative staff of the center, and served only to manage the recruitment of the participants. The second and third files are managed entirely by the research team and contain the registry of all the study outcomes. In these files, participants were identified by a code. Only the research team can relate the data collected in the study to the identity of the participants, which will not be available to anyone except in the event of a medical emergency or legal requirement. These two files have been shared in a public repository (20).