PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Ozturk, Tugba AU - Howell, J Christina AU - Benameur, Karima AU - Ramonell, Richard AU - Cashman, Kevin S. AU - Pirmohammed, Shama AU - Bassit, Leda C. AU - Roback, John D. AU - Marconi, Vincent C. AU - Schinazi, Raymond F. AU - Wharton, Whitney AU - Lee, F. Eun-Hyung AU - Hu, William T TI - Cross-sectional IgM and IgG profiles in SARS-CoV-2 infection AID - 10.1101/2020.05.10.20097535 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.05.10.20097535 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/14/2020.05.10.20097535.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/14/2020.05.10.20097535.full AB - Background Accurate serological assays can improve the early diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but few studies have compared performance characteristics between assays in symptomatic and recovered patients.Methods We recruited 32 patients who had 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19; 18 hospitalized and actively symptomatic, 14 recovered mild cases), and measured levels of IgM (against the full-length S1 or the highly homologous SARS-CoV E protein) and IgG (against S1 receptor binding domain [RBD]). We performed the same analysis in 103 pre-2020 healthy adult control (HC) participants and 13 participants who had negative molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2.Results Anti-S1-RBD IgG levels were very elevated within days of symptom onset for hospitalized patients (median 2.04 optical density [OD], vs. 0.12 in HC). People who recovered from milder COVID-19 only reached similar IgG levels 28 days after symptom onset. IgM levels were elevated early in both groups (median 1.91 and 2.12 vs. 1.14 OD in HC for anti-S1 IgM, 2.23 and 2.26 vs 1.52 in HC for anti-E IgM), with downward trends in hospitalized cases having longer disease duration. The combination of the two IgM levels showed similar sensitivity for COVID-19 as IgG but greater specificity, and identified 4/10 people (vs. 3/10 by IgG) with prior symptoms and negative molecular testing to have had COVID-19.Conclusions Disease severity and timing both influence levels of IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2, with IgG better for early detection of severe cases but IgM more suited for early detection of milder cases.Competing Interest StatementDr. Hu and Emory University have licensed the IgM assay panel for SARS-CoV-2, have a patent on the CSF-based diagnosis of FTLD-TDP, and have a patent pending on the CSF-based prognosis of spinal muscular atrophy; Dr. Hu has consulted for ViveBio, LLC, AARP, Inc, and Biogen, Inc.; and has received research support from Fujirebio US. Dr. Lee is the founder of MicroB-plex, Inc and has research grants with Genentech.Funding StatementThis work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01 AG 054046, R01 AG054991, and T32HL116271.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData available upon reasonable request one year following publication.