RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Deep Learning for Contrast Enhanced Mammography - a Systematic Review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.05.13.24307271
DO 10.1101/2024.05.13.24307271
A1 Sorin, Vera
A1 Sklair-Levy, Miri
A1 Glicksberg, Benjamin S.
A1 Konen, Eli
A1 Nadkarni, Girish N.
A1 Klang, Eyal
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/13/2024.05.13.24307271.abstract
AB Background/Aim: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a relatively novel imaging technique that enables both anatomical and functional breast imaging, with improved diagnostic performance compared to standard 2D mammography. The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature on deep learning (DL) applications for CEM, exploring how these models can further enhance CEM diagnostic potential.Methods This systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched for studies published up to April 2024. MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar were used as search databases. Two reviewers independently implemented the search strategy.Results Sixteen relevant studies published between 2018 and 2024 were identified. All studies but one used convolutional neural network models. All studies evaluated DL algorithms for classification of lesions at CEM, while six studies also assessed lesion detection or segmentation. In three studies segmentation was performed manually, two studies evaluated both manual and automatic segmentation, and ten studies automatically segmented the lesions.Conclusion While still at an early research stage, DL can improve CEM diagnostic precision. However, there is a relatively small number of studies evaluating different DL algorithms, and most studies are retrospective. Further prospective testing to assess performance of applications at actual clinical setting is warranted.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript