RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Crowding and the epidemic intensity of COVID-19 transmission
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.15.20064980
DO 10.1101/2020.04.15.20064980
A1 Rader, Benjamin
A1 Nande, Anjalika
A1 Adlam, Ben
A1 Hill, Alison L.
A1 Reiner, Robert C.
A1 Pigott, David M.
A1 Gutierrez, Bernardo
A1 COVID-19 data working group
A1 Brownstein, John S.
A1 Castro, Marcia C.
A1 Tian, Huaiyu
A1 Pybus, Oliver G.
A1 Scarpino, Samuel V.
A1 Kraemer, Moritz UG
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/12/2020.04.15.20064980.abstract
AB The COVID-19 pandemic is straining public health systems worldwide and major non-pharmaceutical interventions have been implemented to slow its spread1-4. During the initial phase of the outbreak the spread was primarily determined by human mobility5,6. Yet empirical evidence on the effect of key geographic factors on local epidemic spread is lacking7. We analyse highly-resolved spatial variables for cities in China together with case count data in order to investigate the role of climate, urbanization, and variation in interventions across China. Here we show that the epidemic intensity of COVID-19 is strongly shaped by crowding, such that epidemics in dense cities are more spread out through time, and denser cities have larger total incidence. Observed differences in epidemic intensity are well captured by a metapopulation model of COVID-19 that explicitly accounts for spatial hierarchies. Densely-populated cities worldwide may experience more prolonged epidemics. Whilst stringent interventions can shorten the time length of these local epidemics, although these may be difficult to implement in many affected settings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAcknowledgements: The authors thank Kathryn Cordiano for her statistical assistance. BR acknowledges funding from Google.org. MUGK acknowledges funding from European Commission H2020 program (MOOD project) and a Branco Weiss Fellowship. OGP and HT acknowledge funding from the Oxford Martin School. ALH and AN acknowledge funding from the US National Institutes of Health (DP5OD019851). The funding bodies had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, preparation of the manuscript, or the decision to publish. All authors have seen and approved the manuscript.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData availability: We collated epidemiological data from publicly available data sources (news articles, press releases and published reports from public health agencies) which are described in full here17. All the epidemiological information that we used is documented in the main text, the extended data, and supplementary tables. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0448-0