RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Multi-Organ System Metabolic Stress and Sex-Divergent Vascular Associations
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.05.06.24306949
DO 10.1101/2024.05.06.24306949
A1 Kwan, Alan C.
A1 Wang, Minhao
A1 Ji, Hongwei
A1 Claggett, Brian
A1 Ouyang, David
A1 Trivedi, Hirsh
A1 Sharma, Sonia
A1 Shyy, John
A1 Velazquez, Amanda
A1 Ebinger, Joseph E.
A1 Cheng, Susan
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/07/2024.05.06.24306949.abstract
AB Introduction Women experience excess cardiovascular risk compared to men in the setting of similar metabolic disease burden. This consistent finding could be related to sex differences in the vascular response to various forms of metabolic stress. In this study we examine the association of both systemic and organ-specific metabolic stress with vascular health in women and men.Methods We conducted an observational study of 4,299 adult participants (52% women, aged 59±13 years) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018 cohort and 110,225 adult outpatients (55% women, aged 64±16 years) of the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC) 2019 cohort. We used natural splines to examine the association of systemic and organ-specific measures of metabolic stress including body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), hepatic FIB-4 score, and CKD-EPI estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on systolic blood pressure (SBP). Piecewise linear models were generated using normal value thresholds (BMI <25 kg/m2, HbA1c <5.7%, FIB-4 <1.3, and eGFR ≥90 ml/min), which approximated observed spline breakpoints. The primary outcome was increase in SBP (relative to a sex-specific physiologic baseline SBP) in association with increase in level of each metabolic measure.Results Women compared to men demonstrated larger magnitudes and an earlier onset of increase in SBP per increment increase across all metabolic stress measures. The slope of SBP increase per increment of each metabolic measure was greater for women than men particularly for metabolic measures within the normal range, with slope differences of 1.71 mmHg per kg/m2 of BMI, 9.61 mmHg per %HbA1c, 6.45 mmHg per FIB-4 unit, and 0.37 mmHg per ml/min decrement of eGFR in the NHANES cohort (P difference <0.05 for all). Overall results were consistent in the CSMC cohort.Conclusions Women exhibited greater vascular sensitivity in the setting of multiple types of metabolic stress, particularly in periods representing the transition from metabolic health to disease. These findings underscore the importance of involving early metabolic health interventions as part of efforts to mitigate vascular risks in both women and men.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82103908), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2021QH014), Shuimu Scholar Program of Tsinghua University, National Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Support Program (BX20230189), and NIH grants U54-AG065141, UL1TR001881, and K23-HL153888. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The NHANES data were acquired from and are available to the scientific community through https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm. Data was accessed on 4/1/2024 through R Package nhanesA.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe NHANES data were acquired from and are available to the scientific community through https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm. Data was accessed on 4/1/2024 through R Package nhanesA. The internal data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm