RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluation of a Digital Entomological Surveillance Planning Tool for Malaria Vector Control: Three Country Mixed Methods Pilot Study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.05.06.24306921
DO 10.1101/2024.05.06.24306921
A1 Hemingway, Charlotte
A1 Gowelo, Steven
A1 Opiyo, Mercy
A1 Marrenjo, Dulcisaria
A1 Maquina, Mara
A1 Kaunda-Khangamwa, Blessings N.
A1 Kayira, Lusungu
A1 Cherkose, Teklu
A1 Hailmichael, Yohannes
A1 Torres, Neusa
A1 Mucavele, Estevao
A1 Mintade, Muanacha
A1 Candrinho, Baltazar
A1 Mzilahowa, Themba
A1 Gadisa, Endalamaw
A1 Tatarsky, Allison
A1 Vajda, Élodie A.
A1 Dantzer, Emily
A1 Thomsen, Edward
A1 Coleman, Michael
A1 Lobo, Neil
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/06/2024.05.06.24306921.abstract
AB Background Vector control remains the principal method to prevent malaria transmission and has contributed to shrinking the malaria map. However, such gains have stagnated across Africa, underscoring the need to tailor vector control to local drivers of transmission. An Entomological Surveillance Planning Tool (ESPT) was developed to distil normative guidance into an operational decision-support tool to enable cost effective, locally tailored, and evidence-based vector control. To support roll out of the ESPT’s question-based entomological surveillance planning an interactive digital toolkit, eSPT, was developed.Methods The eSPT was evaluated with 49 target users in Ethiopia, Malawi, and Mozambique. The eSPT was introduced to participants through facilitated workshops. A mixed-methods, uncontrolled, before and after study investigated the impact of the eSPT on knowledge, self-efficacy and work practices related to entomological surveillance planning. Qualitative methods were used to explore the acceptability and utility of the eSPT.Results Quantitative measures showed that the facilitated eSPT workshop increased participants’ knowledge and self-efficacy in question-based entomological surveillance planning. Target users responded positively to the eSPT, describing the software as easy and enjoyable to navigate and use. Respondents from academic institutes, central government and international NGOs reported the eSPT to be a useful training tool and believed it could provide substantial efficiencies in the planning process. Further user testing, customizability and compatibility with mobile devices was recommended to enhance the eSPT’s usefulness as a planning tool, especially at the local government level.Conclusions Interactive digital toolkits can be an engaging, efficient, and accessible way to build research and surveillance capacity within relevant organizations and local authorities. This is achieved by combining tailored information and guidance, with functions that enable the development of a planning document, in an easy-to-follow stepwise process. To maximize the usability and usefulness of these toolkits, target users must be centered in the design.Competing Interest StatementI have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: CH, SG, MC, NL are members of the eSPT development team, as the tool is free to use and distribute, they do not stand to gain financially from the publication of this manuscript.Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for the study was obtained from LSTM Research Ethics Committee (22-019), University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board (347594), AHRI/ALERT Ethics Review Committee (PO-50-22), University of Malawi, College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (P.08/22/3710), and Comité Nacional de Bioética para a Saúde de Moçambique (143/CNBS/2022). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData underpinning the results of this study are available upon request by email to the corresponding author charlotte.hemingway{at}lstmed.ac.ukTranscripts will be shared at the corresponding authors discretion with identifiable information redacted to protect the participants’ anonymity.