RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The Association of Social Distancing, Population Density, and Temperature with the SARS-CoV-2 Instantaneous Reproduction Number in Counties Across the United States
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.08.20094474
DO 10.1101/2020.05.08.20094474
A1 Rubin, David
A1 Huang, Jing
A1 Fisher, Brian T.
A1 Gasparrini, Antonio
A1 Tam, Vicky
A1 Song, Lihai
A1 Wang, Xi
A1 Kaufman, Jason
A1 Fitzpatrick, Kate
A1 Jain, Arushi
A1 Griffis, Heather
A1 Crammer, Koby
A1 Tasian, Gregory
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/12/2020.05.08.20094474.abstract
AB Importance The Covid-19 pandemic has been marked by considerable heterogeneity in outbreaks across the United States. Local factors that may be associated with variation in SARS-CoV-2 transmission have not been well studied.Objective To examine the association of county-level factors with variation in the SARS-CoV-2 reproduction number over time.Design Observational studySetting 211 counties in 46 states and the District of Columbia between February 25, 2020 and April 23, 2020.Participants Residents within the counties (55% of the US population)Exposures Social distancing as measured by percent change in visits to non-essential businesses, population density, lagged daily wet bulb temperatures.Main Outcomes and Measures The instantaneous reproduction number (Rt) which is the estimated number of cases generated by one case at a given time during the pandemic.Results Median case incidence was 1185 cases and fatality rate was 43.7 deaths per 100,000 people for the top decile of 21 counties, nearly ten times the incidence and fatality rate in the lowest density quartile. Average Rt in the first two weeks was 5.7 (SD 2.5) in the top decile, compared to 3.1 (SD 1.2) in the lowest quartile. In multivariable analysis, a 50% decrease in visits to non-essential businesses was associated with a 57% decrease in Rt (95% confidence interval, 56% to 58%). Cumulative temperature effects over 4 to 10 days prior to case incidence were nonlinear; relative Rt decreased as temperatures warmed above 32°F to 53°F, which was the point of minimum Rt, then increased between 53°F and 66°F, at which point Rt began to decrease. At 55°F, and with a 70% reduction in visits to non-essential business, 96% of counties were estimated to fall below a threshold Rt of 1.0, including 86% of counties among the top density decile and 98% of counties in the lowest density quartile.Conclusions and Relevance Social distancing, lower population density, and temperate weather change were associated with a decreased SARS-Co-V-2 Rt in counties across the United States. These relationships can inform selective public policy planning in communities during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Question How is the instantaneous reproduction number (Rt) of SARS-CoV-2 influenced by local area effects of social distancing, wet bulb temperature, and population density in counties across the United States?Findings Social distancing, temperate weather, and lower population density were associated with a decrease in Rt. Of these county-specific factors, social distancing appeared to be the most significant in reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission.Meaning Rt varies significantly across counties. The relationship between Rt and county-specific factors can inform policies to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission in selective and heterogeneous communities.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThere is no availability to the data referred to in the manuscript.