RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Insights into Professional Preferences and Rationale for Surgical Sequencing in Managing Hip-Spine Syndrome
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.04.13.24305764
DO 10.1101/2024.04.13.24305764
A1 Breuning, Carolina
A1 Tian, Xinggui
A1 Goronzy, Jens
A1 Günther, Klaus-Peter
A1 Platz, Uwe
A1 Beyer, Franziska
A1 Disch, Alexander Carl
A1 Lachiewicz, Paul F.
A1 Liu, Ning
A1 Goodman, Stuart B.
A1 Wood, Kirkham B.
A1 Zwingenberger, Stefan
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/03/2024.04.13.24305764.abstract
AB Background The optimal sequence of hip and spine surgeries for hip-spine syndrome management remains a contentious issue. This study aimed to investigate the preferences and rationale behind the sequence of surgical treatments across various hip-spine syndrome scenarios among potential specialist interviewees.Methods A questionnaire survey, featuring five fictional clinical presentations encompassing symptomatic hip osteoarthritis and diverse spinal pathologies, was conducted among German hip and spine surgeons, alongside conducting a cross-national comparison with previous US survey.Results German hip and spine surgeons preferred spine-first surgery in hip-spine syndrome scenarios involving neurological deficits, while preferred hip-first in scenarios without such deficits. In contrast, US surgeons demonstrated differing sequencing patterns, highlighting differences between nations. Notably, distinct surgical order preferences were observed among different specialists. Surgeons’ decision-making was primarily influenced by symptom severity and urgency, spine-pelvis-hip biomechanics, and treatment efficacy.Conclusion The sequence of hip and spine surgery in various hip-spine syndrome scenarios has different preference patterns, with professional preferences and cross-nation differences, and is guided by the multifaceted considerations involved in surgical decision-making.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was received for conducting this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was waived by the local Ethics Committee of Technical University of Dresden in view of the nature of the research study (No. EK45012019).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.