RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Temporal trajectories of COVID-19 symptoms in adults with 22 months follow-up in a prospective cohort study in Norway
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.04.30.24306604
DO 10.1101/2024.04.30.24306604
A1 Ellingjord-Dale, Merete
A1 Nygaard, Anders
A1 Støer, Nathalie C
A1 Bø, Ragnhild
A1 Landrø, Nils Inge
A1 Brunvoll, Sonja Hjellegjerde
A1 Istre, Mette
A1 Kalleberg, Karl Trygve
A1 Dahl, John Arne
A1 Geng, Linda
A1 Tsilidis, Kostas
A1 Riboli, Elio
A1 Ursin, Giske
A1 Søraas, Arne Vasli Lund
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/01/2024.04.30.24306604.abstract
AB Objectives We aimed to describe the trajectories of cognitive and physical symptoms before, during, and after a positive- or negative SARS-CoV-2 test and in untested controls.Design A prospective cohort study.Setting Norway, 27 March 2020 to 6 July 2022Participants A total of 146 065 volunteers were recruited. Of these, 120 605 participants (mean age 49 (SD 13.7), 69% female), were initially untested for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, completed one or more follow-up questionnaires (response rates 72-90%) and were included for analysis. After 22 months of follow-up, 15 737 participants had a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, 67 305 a negative test, and 37 563 were still untested.Main outcome measures We assessed reported symptoms the past three weeks of memory or concentration problems, anosmia and dysgeusia, dyspnoea, fatigue, fever, headache, cough, muscular pain, nasal symptoms, sore throat and abdominal pain at baseline and through four follow-up questionnaires. In addition, overall health compared to a year before was measured with a five-point scale and memory problems were measured using the Everyday Memory Questionnaire-13 at two timepoints.The exposure, SARS-CoV-2 test status (positive, negative or untested), was obtained from a mandatory national registry or from self-report, and data were analysed using mixed model logistic regression.Results A positive SARS-CoV-2-test was associated with the following persistent symptoms, compared with participants with a negative test (1-3 months after a negative test); memory problems (3 to 6 months after a positive test: adjusted odds ratio (OR) 9.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.5 to 10.9; 12 to 18 months: OR 7.8, CI 5.7 to 10.8), concentration problems (3 to 6 months: OR 6.1, CI 4.8 to 6.5; 12 to 18 months: OR 5.3, CI 3.9 to 7.1), anosmia and dysgeusia, dyspnoea and fatigue as well as self-assessed worsening of overall health.Conclusion A positive SARS-CoV-2 test was associated with new onset memory- and concentration problems, anosmia and dysgeusia, dyspnoea and fatigue as well as self-assessed worsening of overall health, which persisted for the length of the follow-up of 22 months, even when correcting for symptoms before COVID-19 and compared to symptoms in negative controls.Trial registration ClinicalTrials ID: NCT04320732What is already known of this topicCognitive difficulties and physical symptoms have been reported after infections with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but lack of studies with data before and after infections have sparked a global debate regarding severity and duration of these symptoms.Post acute viral syndromes have been described after many different infections, but it is unknown whether the symptoms of “long-COVID” or Post Acute Sequela after COVID-19 (PASC) are specific to the SARS-CoV-2 or not.What this study addsWe found a significant and long-term increase in cognitive symptoms, anosmia and dysgeusia, dyspnoea, fatigue, and self-assessed worsening of overall health after a positive (COVID-19) but not a negative (indication of another infection) SARS-CoV-2 test.To our knowledge, this is the first large cohort study to report the trajectories of both cognitive and physical symptoms from before and up to 22 months after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative controls.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://clinicaltrials.gov Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Research Council of Norway (no: 324274) and Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (internal funding). The funder had no role in the conduction, collection of data or interpretation of results.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Norwegian Regional Committee for Research Ethics (REK 151 124170), and all participants submitted electronic informed consent forms.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesIndividual level data from the study for the purposes outlined in the consent form can be shared with other researchers in a timely fashion. The data are regulated under the European GDPR regulative and sharing of data must be approved by the Data Protection Officer at Oslo University Hospital. Data will be made available for researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved.