PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Uptegraft, Maj Colby C. AU - Witkop, Catherine T. TI - Creation of a Clinical Decision-Support Tool for Assigning Occupational Disability to United States Air Force Personnel AID - 10.1101/2020.05.07.20090530 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.05.07.20090530 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/11/2020.05.07.20090530.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/11/2020.05.07.20090530.full AB - Occupational dispositions (profiles) are the top reason active duty service members are not medically ready to deploy or fulfill their job responsibilities. An audit across multiple U.S. Air Force (AF) medical treatment facilities revealed significant shortcomings in how medical providers assign profiles. We aimed to create a predictive model and a decision-support tool that estimates profile duration.Using retrospective profiles (n=1,546,805) from the Aeromedical Services Information Management System between 1 Feb 2007 and 31 Jan 2017, we built and validated a decision-support tool that estimates profile length. Multivariate quantile regressions (n=2,575) were performed across five quantiles and six levels of diagnostic specificity for every diagnostic code with 2,100 or more observations.The models universally estimated profile duration with very poor accuracy (pseudoR2 0.000 to 0.168); however, predictive ability was directly correlated with quantile level with minimal variation by diagnostic specificity. Age, O4 to O6+ ranks, very heavy job class, and co-morbid conditions were all significant in more than 25.0% of regressions down all levels of diagnostic specificity. Age, co-morbid conditions, E7-E9 ranks, O4 to O6+ ranks, and light job class all added days to profile duration while E1 to E4 ranks, heavy, and very heavy job class subtracted days.While this study failed to produce an accurate tool, several findings, the indirect correlation between profile duration and very heavy job class and the assignment of durations based on convenient calendar times, warrant further investigation. For now, providers may consult existing decision-support tools when building profiles for AF service members, heeding attention that they were built with non-representative civilian populations.Disclaimer The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Army, US Navy, US Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the US Government.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was provided to support this research study.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data referenced in the manuscript are from the Aeromedical Services Information Management System (ASIMS) and provided by the Defense Health Agency (DHA). It is not freely available and requires specialized access and a data use agreement.