PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Ritsch, Nina AU - Bourque, Camille AU - Bergeron, Frederic AU - Nazare, Julie-Anne AU - Dougkas, Anestis AU - Iceta, Sylvain TI - Gastric modulation of food reward, olfaction and taste in obesity and bariatric surgery: an artificial intelligence assisted scoping review protocol AID - 10.1101/2024.04.29.24306451 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.04.29.24306451 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/30/2024.04.29.24306451.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/30/2024.04.29.24306451.full AB - Objective To understand the extent and nature of the available research on gastric modulation of food reward, olfaction, and taste in people with obesity or those who have undergone bariatric surgery.Introduction Bariatric surgery-induced weight loss is partially attributed to shifts in food preferences resulting from alterations in sensory perceptions and changes in reward system. The stomach’s innervation and mechanical function have been theorized to play a significant role in these modifications, as suggested by numerous preclinical studies. However, the extent and nature of these connections in clinical settings require further elucidation.Inclusion criteria This review will examine studies on the influence of gastric innervation and/or mechanical function on food reward, olfaction, and taste. Selected studies will include participants of all ages with obesity or bariatric surgery. Both observational studies and controlled experiments will be considered, while study protocols, opinion articles, letters to the editor, book chapters, oral communication or poster abstracts and systematic reviews will be excluded.Methods The search will be undertaken in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and gray literature. No date parameters will be set, and all languages will be considered. Citations will be uploaded into EndNote 20.0 and duplicates removed using Covidence. The remaining studies will be analyzed by 3 reviewers using a two-stage procedure with the ASReview python package. The full-text screening and the data extraction will be conducted by 2 reviewers on Covidence. An additional reviewer will be consulted in the event of disagreement. Tabulated results will be accompanied by a narrative summary.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/mdx9t https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-mdx9t-v1 Funding StatementNR is supported by grants from Agence Nationale Recherche et Technologie (ANRT), grants from Foundation GERARD PELISSON and from the Faculty of Medicine of Universite Laval, Quebec, Canada. SI is supported by Fond de Recherche du Quebec, Research Scholar Junior 1 grant. NR and SI grants are not directly linked to this scoping review project but provide part of their wages. The funders have not been involved in this project in any manner.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The studies used in this scoping review will be extracted from the following databases: Medline (Ovid), Embase, (Embase.com), CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycInfo (Ovid) and Web of Science.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study will be available upon reasonable request to the authors once the scoping review will be published.