PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Manikpurage, Hasanga D.
AU  - Ricard, Jasmin
AU  - Houessou, Ursula
AU  - Bourgault, Jérôme
AU  - Gagnon, Eloi
AU  - Gobeil, Emilie
AU  - Girard, Arnaud
AU  - Li, Zhonglin
AU  - Eslami, Aida
AU  - Mathieu, Patrick
AU  - Bossé, Yohan
AU  - Arsenault, Benoit J.
AU  - Thériault, Sébastien
TI  - Association of Genetically Predicted Levels of Circulating Blood Lipids with Coronary Artery Disease Incidence
AID  - 10.1101/2024.04.23.24306257
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.04.23.24306257
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/26/2024.04.23.24306257.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/26/2024.04.23.24306257.full
AB  - Background Estimating the genetic risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is now possible by aggregating data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) into polygenic risk scores (PRS). Combining multiple PRS for specific circulating blood lipids could improve risk prediction. Here, we sought to evaluate the performance of PRS derived from CAD and blood lipids GWAS to predict the incidence of CAD.Methods This study included individuals aged between 40 and 69 recruited in UK Biobank (UKB). We conducted GWAS for blood lipids measured by nuclear magnetic resonance in individuals without lipid-lowering treatments (n=73,915). Summary statistics were used to derive and calculate PRS in the remaining participants (n=318,051). A PRSCAD was also derived using the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D GWAS. Hazard ratios (HR) for CAD (9,017 / 301,576; median follow-up time: 12.6 years) were calculated per standard deviation increase in each PRS. Discrimination capacity and goodness of fit of the models were evaluated.Results Out of 30 PRS, 28 were significantly associated with the incidence of CAD (P<0.05). The optimal combination of PRS included PRS for CAD, VLDL-C, total cholesterol and triglycerides. Discriminative capacities were significantly increased in the model including PRSCAD and clinical risk factors (CRF) (C-statistic=0.778 [0.773-0.782]) compared to the model with CRF only (C-statistic=0.755 [0.751-0.760]). Although the C-statistic remained similar when independent lipids PRS were added to the model with PRSCAD and CRF (C-statistic=0.778 [0.773-0.783]), the goodness of fit was significantly increased (chi-square test statistic=20.18, P=1.56e-04).Conclusions Although independently associated with CAD incidence, blood lipids PRS provide modest improvement in the predictive performance when added to PRSCAD.HighlightsGenome-wide association studies were conducted on 29 selected lipid traits measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in 73,915 participants from UK Biobank who were not taking lipid-lowering treatment.Polygenic risk scores for 27 out of 29 of these traits were associated with the incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in 9,017 cases out of 301,576 individuals followed for a median of 12.6 years.When combined to a PRS for coronary artery disease, there was a significant but modest improvement in the discrimination capacity for incident CAD.PRS for certain lipid traits might help to stratify the risk of CAD.Competing Interest StatementBJA is a consultant for Novartis and Silence Therapeutics and has received research funding from Pfizer and Ionis Pharmaceuticals. The other authors report no conflicts.Funding StatementHDM holds a doctoral research award from the Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval. BJA holds a senior scholar award from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec: Santé. YB holds a Canada Research Chair in Genomics of Heart and Lung Diseases. PM is the recipient of the Joseph C. Edwards Foundation granted to Université Laval. This work was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT?162344) to ST.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Data that support our findings are available through appropriate application to UK Biobank (UKB). UKB is a large-scale prospective study that received approval from the British National Health Service, North West - Haydock Research Ethics Committee (16/NW/0274). This cohort includes electronic health records of > 500,000 individuals aged between 40 and 73 years at baseline and recruited from 2006 to 2010 in the United Kingdom. All participants of UKB provided informed consent at the baseline assessment. Data access permission for this study was granted under UKB application 25205.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesComputational codes are available, without compromising sensitive individual-level data, from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Summary statistics of genome-wide association studies and effect sizes to calculate PRS will be deposited respectively on GWAS Catalog platform (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/) and PGS Catalog (https://www.pgscatalog.org).Non-Standard Abbreviations and AcronymsApoA1Apolipoprotein A1ApoBApolipoprotein BCADCoronary Artery DiseaseCRFClinical Risk FactorsDHADocosahexaenoic AcidEPAEicosapentaenoic AcidFAFatty AcidsFUMAFunctional Mapping and AnnotationGLGCGlobal Lipid Genetic ConsortiumGWASGenome Wide Association StudyHESHospital Episode StatisticsIDLIntermediate Density LipoproteinsISIschemic StrokeLALinoleic AcidLDLinkage DisequilibriumLLTLipid Lowering TreatmentsLp(a)Lipoprotein(a)MAGMAMulti-marker Analysis of GenoMic AnnotationMIMyocardial InfarctionMUFAMono-Unsaturated Fatty AcidsNMRNuclear Magnetic ResonanceNRINet Reclassification ImprovementOPSC-4Office Of Population, Censuses and Surveys Classification of Interventions and Procedures, Version 4PCsFirst Ten Genetic Principal ComponentsPCEPooled Cohort EquationPRSPolygenic Risk ScorePUFAPolyunsaturated Fatty AcidsSFASaturated Fatty AcidsSBPSystolic Blood PressureTCTotal CholesterolTGTriglyceridesUKBUK BiobankVLDLVery Low-Density LipoproteinsXL-VLDLExtra Large Very Low-Density Lipoproteins or Chylomicrons