RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 eXtended Reality Enhanced Mental Health Consultation Training
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.04.24.24305923
DO 10.1101/2024.04.24.24305923
A1 Hiley, Katherine
A1 Mohammad, Zanib Bi
A1 Taylor, Luke
A1 Dawson, Rebecca Burgess-
A1 Patterson, Dominic
A1 Puttick, Devon
A1 Gay, Chris
A1 Hiscoe, Janette
A1 Munsch, Chris
A1 Richardson, Sally
A1 Knowles-Lee, Mark
A1 Beecham, Celia
A1 Ralph, Neil
A1 Chatterjee, Arunangsu
A1 Mathew, Ryan K
A1 Mushtaq, Faisal
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/24/2024.04.24.24305923.abstract
AB Objectives Given the growing societal and healthcare service need for trained mental health and care workers, coupled with the heterogeneity of exposure during training and the shortage of placement opportunities, we explored the feasibility and utility of a novel XR tool for mental health consultation training.Design Evaluation of a novel XR training simulation for mental health consultation.Setting Mental health and primary care training environments. Including Universities and NHS hospitals.Participants A total of 123 participants completed the study, including Mental Health Nursing trainees, General Practitioner Doctors in Training, and students in psychology and medicine.Interventions We set out to evaluate a training simulation created through a collaboration between software developers, clinicians and learning technologists. Participants engaged with a virtual patient, ‘Stacey’, through a virtual reality or augmented reality head-mounted display. The tool was designed to provide trainee healthcare professionals with an immersive experience of a consultation with a patient presenting with perinatal mental health symptoms. Users verbally interacted with the patient, and a human instructor selected responses from a repository of pre-recorded voice-acted clips.Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures The primary outcomes were cognitive and affective learning outcomes, including understanding, motivation, and anxiety related to mental health consultations. Secondary outcomes were considerations towards careers in perinatal mental health, experiences of presence, system usability.Results We found significant enhancements in learning metrics across all participant groups. Notably, there was a marked increase in understanding (p<.001) and motivation (p<.001), coupled with decreased anxiety related to mental health consultations (p<.001). There were also significant improvements to considerations towards careers in perinatal mental health (p<.001).Conclusions These findings show, for the first time, that XR can be used to provide an effective, standardised, and reproducible tool for trainees to develop their mental health consultation skills. We suggest that XR could provide a solution to overcoming the current resource challenges associated with equipping current and future healthcare professionals, which are likely to be exacerbated by workforce expansion plan.Competing Interest StatementAuthors from the University of Leeds declare no conflict of interest relating to this study and undertook data collection and analysis independent to the rest of the authorship team. Authors Mark-Knowles Lee (Founder, Fracture Reality) and Celia Beecham (Product Manager, Fracture Reality) led the development of the application. They were not involved in the data collection or analysis and did not contribute to the discussion section of this manuscript. Co-authors Rebecca Burgess-Dawson and Dominic Patterson, Health Education England, now NHS England, contributed to the development of the simulation scenarios created by Fracture Reality, and in developing the research project and were not involved in the data collection, or analysis. Devon Puttick, Chris Gay, Janette Hiscoe, Sally Richardson, were involved at a project supervisory level from Health Education England, now NHS England, and were not involved in data collection or analysis.Funding StatementThis project was funded by Health Education England, now part of NHS England. Authors RM and FM are supported in part by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203331). FM is further supported by the European Union Horizon Research and Innovation programme under grant agreement no. 101070155 and the UKRI through the Horizon Europe Guarantee (#10039307).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics for the study was approved by School of Psychology Ethics Committee at the University of Leeds Reference: PSYC-615.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced will anonymised dataset available on Open Science Framework on publication.