RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Assessment of a serological diagnostic kit of SARS-CoV-2 availble in Iran
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.04.20090209
DO 10.1101/2020.05.04.20090209
A1 Shamsollahi, Hamid Reza
A1 Amini, Mostafa
A1 Alizadeh, Shaban
A1 Nedjat, Saharnaz
A1 Akbari-Sari, Ali
A1 Rezaei, Mehdi
A1 Allameh, Seyed Farshad
A1 Fotouhi, Akbar
A1 Yunesian, Masud
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/08/2020.05.04.20090209.abstract
AB Background The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic broke out in December 2019 and now is characterized as a pandemic. The effective control of this infectious disease requires access to diagnostic techniques, both for case finding and epidemic size estimation. The molecular technique is routinely being used worldwide. Although it is the “standard” case detection and management method, it has its own shortcomings. Thus, some easy-to-use rapid serological tests were developed.Methods One hundred and fourteen positive RT-PCR-diagnosed patients were tested by VivaDiag Kit, a brand of rapid serological kits available in hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran. Frozen serum specimens taken from healthy people in summer and autumn 2019, were also tested as negative controls.Results The test sensitivity was 47.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.8-56.9) for IgM and 47.0% (95% CI: 38.0-56.0) for IgG. There was no difference between IgG and IgM seropositivity except in one case. Specificity was calculated as 99.0% (95% CI: 96.4-99.9) for IgM and of 100.0% (95% CI: 0.98.2-100.0) for IgG. Sensitivity was higher in men and older participants.Conclusion This test can be used for epidemiological investigations especially for the estimation of the level of infection in the community, after it is properly corrected for sensitivity and specificity. The low sensitivity could be attributed to the technical limitation of the kits or low levels of antibodies after infection. The different sensitivity in age and sex groups supports the hypothesis that different people show different immune responses to this virus.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialIR.TUMS.VCR.REC.1399.045Funding StatementThis research is performed by financial support of deputy of research and technology at Tehran university of medical sciences,Tehran,Iran. The grant number is : 99-1-99-47288.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll the data is available in the passage.