RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Extending A Chronological and Geographical Analysis of Personal Reports of COVID-19 on Twitter to England, UK
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.05.20083436
DO 10.1101/2020.05.05.20083436
A1 Golder, S
A1 Klein, Ari Z.
A1 Magge, Arjun
A1 O’Connor, Karen
A1 Cai, Haitao
A1 Weissenbacher, Davy
A1 Gonzalez-Hernandez, Graciela
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/08/2020.05.05.20083436.abstract
AB The rapidly evolving COVID-19 pandemic presents challenges for actively monitoring its transmission. In this study, we extend a social media mining approach used in the US to automatically identify personal reports of COVID-19 on Twitter in England, UK. The findings indicate that natural language processing and machine learning framework could help provide an early indication of the chronological and geographical distribution of COVID-19 in England.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Library of Medicine (NLM) grant R01LM011176 and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) grant R01AI117011.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe annotated data that was used to train the classifier for the evaluation in this study is available as a supplemental file with this article. Tweets annotated as “other,” “probable,” and “possible” are labeled as “0,” “1,” and “2,” respectively. To download the tweets, a Python script is available at https://bitbucket.org/pennhlp/twitter_data_download/src/master/.