PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Lee, Vincent Kyu AU - Reynolds, William T. AU - Wallace, Julia AU - Beluk, Nancy AU - Badaly, Daryaneh AU - Lo, Cecilia W AU - Ceschin, Rafael AU - Panigrahy, Ashok TI - Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Cerebral Spinal Fluid Flow Properties and Executive Function Cognitive Outcomes in Congenital Heart Disease AID - 10.1101/2024.04.19.24306104 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.04.19.24306104 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/20/2024.04.19.24306104.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/20/2024.04.19.24306104.full AB - Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation has recently been shown to be important in nutrient distribution, waste removal, and neurogenesis. Increased CSF volumes are frequently observed in congenital heart disease (CHD) and are associated with neurodevelopmental deficits. This suggests prolonged perturbation to the CSF system and possible interference to its homeostatic function, which may contribute to the neurodevelopmental deficits in CHD. CSF flow has yet to be studied in CHD patients, but the pulsatile flow of CSF throughout the brain is driven mainly by cardiopulmonary circulation. Given the underlying heart defects in CHD, the cardiopulmonary circulatory mechanisms in CHD might be impaired with resultant perturbation on the CSF circulation. In this study, we determine whether CSF flow, using MRI measurements of static and dynamic pulsatile flow, is abnormal in youths with CHD compared to healthy controls in relation to executive cognitive function. CSF flow measurements were obtained on a total of 58 child and young adult participants (CHD=20, healthy controls = 38). The CSF flow was measured across the lumen of the Aqueduct of Sylvius using cardiac-gated phase-contrast MRI at 3.0T. Static pulsatility was characterized as anterograde and retrograde peak velocities, mean velocity, velocity variance measurements, and dynamic pulsatility calculated as each participant’s CSF flow deviation from the study cohort’s consensus flow measured with root mean squared deviation (RMSD) were obtained. The participants had neurocognitive assessments for executive function with focus on inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and working memory domains. The CHD group demonstrated greater dynamic pulsatility (higher overall flow RMSD over the entire CSF flow cycle) compared to controls (p=0.0353), with no difference detected in static pulsatility measures. However, lower static CSF flow pulsatility (anterograde peak velocity: p=0.0323) and lower dynamic CSF flow pulsatility (RMSD: p=0.0181) predicted poor inhibitory executive function outcome. Taken together, while the whole CHD group exhibited higher dynamic CSF flow pulsatility compared to controls, the subset of CHD subjects with relatively reduced static and dynamic CSF flow pulsatility had the worst executive functioning, specifically the inhibition domain. These findings suggest that altered CSF flow pulsatility may be central to not only brain compensatory mechanisms but can also drive cognitive impairment in CHD. Further studies are needed to investigate possible mechanistic etiologies of aberrant CSF pulsatility (i.e. primary cardiac hemodynamic disturbances, intrinsic brain vascular stiffness, altered visco-elastic properties of tissue, or glial-lymphatic disturbances), which can result in acquired small vessel brain injury (including microbleeds and white matter hyperintensities).Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Department of Defense (W81XWH-16-1-0613), the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (R01 HL152740-1, R01 HL128818-05, and F31 HL165730-02), the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute with National Institute of Aging (R01 HL128818-05 S1), the National Library of Medicine (5T15LM007059-27) and Additional Ventures.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of University of Pittsburgh gave ethical approval for this work University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board STUDY20060128: Multimodal Connectome Study approval 23 July 2020 and STUDY1904003 Ciliary Dysfunction, Brain Dysplasia, and Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Congenital approval 6 February 2023I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesIndividual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices), Study Protocol, and Statistical Analysis Plan, are available upon formal request. Requests should be submitted to the corresponding author.