PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Msuya, Ibrahim
AU  - Boudou, Martin
AU  - Levira, Francis
AU  - Moshi, Irene
AU  - O’Dwyer, Jean
AU  - Killeen, Gerard
TI  - Evaluation of a participatory approach to stratifying neighbourhoods across the Tanzanian city of Dar es Salaam in terms of income by comparing with latent profile analysis of deprivation based on national census data
AID  - 10.1101/2024.04.19.24305791
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.04.19.24305791
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/19/2024.04.19.24305791.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/19/2024.04.19.24305791.full
AB  - Studying geographic heterogeneities in the characteristics of city neighbourhoods, such as population income and deprivation, has been a common practice in urban health studies for tailored and targeted interventions, especially in highly developed and diversified cities. While a range of different approaches has been applied to classify different parts of towns and cities, participatory stratification approaches (PSAs) have become popular despite their subjective basis because of their affordability, simplicity and practicality, all of which allow them to be frequently updated. While more objective statistical approaches, such as latent profile analysis (LPA), can also be used to stratify neighbourhoods using formal socio-economic and demographic data, these rely on the availability of rich datasets and advanced analytical capacities that are not always available in low and middle-income countries. This study assessed a PSA to stratify neighbourhoods across the Tanzania city of Dar es Salaam in terms of income, by comparing it with a complementary LPA using national census data from 2012 to stratify them in terms of deprivation. A consultative community-based workshop was used for the PSA, while 15 selected deprivation indicators from the census data were used to profile them using LPA. While the PSA allocated neighbourhoods to five income strata, six clear deprivation strata could be distinguished by LPA. A strong positive correlation was observed between the stratum identified by the LPA and that obtained through the PSA (ρ = 0.739, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, paired comparison of the two sets of correlation coefficients between each deprivation indicator and the stratum assigned by each stratification approach revealed no difference (V = 33, p-value = 0.1354), confirming that the two approaches yielded very similar patterns of stratification., Also, the two approaches yielded broadly comparable cartographic pictures of the city, depicting similar spatial distribution of wealth and poverty. Overall, this evidence indicates that subjective community knowledge and lived experience may be invaluable for understanding the built environment and for mapping out pockets of poverty and affluence at fine scales with minimum resources.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was conducted as part of the Centre for Sustainable Healthy and Learning Cities and Neighbourhoods funded via UK Research and Innovation and administered through the Economic and Social Research Council as part of the UK Governments Global Challenges Research Fund. Project Reference: ES/P011020/1. The funders had no role in study design data collection and analysis decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical clearance for the study, a component of the Sustainable Cities project at Ifakara Health Institute (IHI), was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Ifakara Health Institute (IHI/IRB/NO: 26-2018) and the Medical Research Coordinating Committee at the National Institute for Medical Research in Tanzania (NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol. IX/2954).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the National Bureau of Statistics of Tanzania https://www.nbs.go.tz/index.php/en/