PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Callahan, Cody J AU - Lee, Rose AU - Zulauf, Katelyn E. AU - Tamburello, Lauren AU - Smith, Kenneth P. AU - Previtera, Joe AU - Cheng, Annie AU - Green, Alex AU - Azim, Ahmed Abdul AU - Yano, Amanda AU - Doraiswami, Nancy AU - Kirby, James E. AU - Arnaout, Ramy A. TI - Open Development and Clinical Validation Of Multiple 3D-Printed Sample-Collection Swabs: Rapid Resolution of a Critical COVID-19 Testing Bottleneck AID - 10.1101/2020.04.14.20065094 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.04.14.20065094 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/07/2020.04.14.20065094.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/07/2020.04.14.20065094.full AB - The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused a severe international shortage of the nasopharyngeal swabs that are required for collection of optimal specimens, creating a critical bottleneck in the way of high-sensitivity virological testing for COVID-19. To address this crisis, we designed and executed an innovative, radically cooperative, rapid-response translational-research program that brought together healthcare workers, manufacturers, and scientists to emergently develop and clinically validate new swabs for immediate mass production by 3D printing. We performed a rigorous multi-step preclinical evaluation on 160 swab designs and 48 materials from 24 companies, laboratories, and individuals, and shared results and other feedback via a public data repository (http://github.com/rarnaout/Covidswab/). We validated four prototypes through an institutional review board (IRB)-approved clinical trial that involved 276 outpatient volunteers who presented to our hospital’s drive-through testing center with symptoms suspicious for COVID-19. Each participant was swabbed with a reference swab (the control) and a prototype, and SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results were compared. All prototypes displayed excellent concordance with the control (κ=0.85-0.89). Cycle-threshold (Ct) values were not significantly different between each prototype and the control, supporting the new swabs’ non-inferiority (Mann-Whitney U [MWU] p>0.05). Study staff preferred one of the prototypes over the others and the control swab overall. The total time elapsed between identification of the problem and validation of the first prototype was 22 days. Contact information for ordering can be found at http://printedswabs.org. Our experience holds lessons for the rapid development, validation, and deployment of new technology for this pandemic and beyond.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) Institutional Review Board (IRB) Protocol 2020P000323Funding StatementPayments covering the cost of the IRB and clinical trial PCR were provided by Carbon3D, EnvisionTec, Origin, Inc, and Hewlett-Packard.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data supporting the findings of this study is available at https://github.com/rarnaout/Covidswab https://github.com/rarnaout/Covidswab