RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Enhancing system empathy within a UK Emergency Department: A feasibility interprofessional priority setting exercise
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.04.15.24305826
DO 10.1101/2024.04.15.24305826
A1 Howick, Jeremy
A1 Ward, Andy
A1 Grantham, Charlotte
A1 Bennett-Weston, Amber
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/16/2024.04.15.24305826.abstract
AB Background System-level barriers inhibit empathy in healthcare, and this can harm patients and practitioners. The barriers include burnout-inducing administrative workloads, burdensome protocols, lack of wellbeing spaces, un-empathic leadership, and not emphasising empathy as an institutional value. A workshop aimed at enhancing empathic systems was successfully delivered in Canada but has not been tested in the UK National Health Service (NHS) setting.Aim To test the feasibility of an empathic systems workshop within the UK NHS setting.Methods We conducted an interprofessional group of an emergency department (ED). We used a modified nominal group technique to prioritise actions to enhance empathy in the ED system. Satisfaction with the workshop and confidence that the workshop would lead to change were measured on a 10-point Likert scale.Results Twenty-eight participants representing the following stakeholder groups attended the workshop: leaders, consultants, nurses, security, and porters. The group agreed to generating a better wellbeing action plan and implementing an effective secondary triage system. Seventy-three percent (73%) rated their satisfaction with the workshop as 8 or higher out of ten, and 63% reported being confident that the workshop would lead to positive change.Limitations A doctors strike limited the range of stakeholders who were able to attend, and long-term follow up was not conducted.Conclusions Participants in a UK setting were satisfied with a previously developed system empathy workshop and reported being confident that it would lead to positive change. Participants were able to prioritise changes that would improve system empathy and were confident that the changes would be effective.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementJH, AW, and ABW are supported by the Stoneygate Trust (grant number not applicable). The funder had no role in the conceptualisation, design, data collection, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData related to this research is included in this publication. Please contact the corresponding author if additional information is required.