RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Quantification of stress and well-being using pulse, speech, and electrodermal data: Study concept and design
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.01.20082610
DO 10.1101/2020.05.01.20082610
A1 Izumi, Keisuke
A1 Minato, Kazumichi
A1 Shiga, Kiko
A1 Sugio, Tatsuki
A1 Hanashiro, Sayaka
A1 Cortright, Kelley
A1 Kudo, Shun
A1 Fujita, Takanori
A1 Sado, Mitsuhiro
A1 Maeno, Takashi
A1 Takebayashi, Toru
A1 Mimura, Masaru
A1 Kishimoto, Taishiro
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/06/2020.05.01.20082610.abstract
AB Introduction Mental disorders are a leading cause of disability worldwide and, among mental disorders, major depressive disorder was highly ranked in years lived with disability. Depression has a significant impact in the field of occupational health because it is particularly prevalent during working age. On the other hand, there are a growing number of studies on the relationship between “well-being” and employee productivity. To promote healthy and productive workplaces, this study aims to develop a technique to quantify stress and well-being in a way that does not disturb the workplace.Methods and analysis This is a single-arm prospective observational study. The target population is adult (>20 years old) workers at companies that often engage in desk work; specifically, a person who sits in front of a computer for at least half their work hours. The following data will be collected: a) participants’ background characteristics; b) participants’ biological data during the 4-week observation period using sensing devices such as a camera built into or connected to the computer (pulse wave data extracted from the facial video images), a microphone built into or connected to their work computer (voice data), and a wristband-type wearable device (electrodermal activity data, body motion data, and body temperature); c) stress, well-being, and depression rating scale assessment data (New Occupational Stress Questionnaire, Perceived Stress Scale, Satisfaction With Life Scale, Japanese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Japanese Flourishing Scale, Subjective Well-being / Ideal Happiness, and Japanese version of Patient Health Questionnaire-9). The analysis workflow is as follows: (1) primary analysis, comprised of using software to digitalize participants’ vital information; (2) secondary analysis, comprised of examining the relationship between the quantified vital data from (1), stress, well-being, and depression; (3) tertiary analysis, comprised of generating machine learning algorithms to estimate stress, well-being, and degree of depression in relation to each set of vital data as well as multimodal vital data.Ethics and dissemination Collected data and study results will be disseminated widely through conference presentations, journal publications, and/or mass media. The summarized results of our overall analysis will be supplied to participants.Registration UMIN000036814STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYThis study evaluates stress and well-being using biomarkers such as heart rate, acoustic characteristics, and electrodermal activity.This study measures biomarkers over a long-term four-week period.This study will lead to the development of a machine learning algorithm to determine people’s optimal levels of stress and well-being.This is a government-funded study in which many different companies and institutions collaborated for a common purpose.There is a possibility that the algorithm’s prediction accuracy level may decrease when it is applied to demographic groups other than those studied here.Issue date: 2020-Jan.-28, Protocol amendment number: 1.2Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialUMIN000036814Clinical Protocolshttps://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=brows&action=brows&recptno=R000041686&type=summary&language=JFunding StatementThis work was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (grant number 18le0110008h0001). The funding source did not participate in the design of this study and will not have any hand in the study's execution, analyses, or submission of results. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) 20F Yomiuri Shimbun Bldg. 1-7-1 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0004 Japan Tel: +81-3-6870-2200, Fax: +81-3-6870-2241, Email: jimu-ask{at}amed.go.jpAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNot applicable