RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Fixed-Life or Rechargeable Battery for Deep Brain Stimulation: Preference and Satisfaction in Chinese Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.28.20082677
DO 10.1101/2020.04.28.20082677
A1 Qiu, Xian
A1 Peng, Tingting
A1 Lin, Zhengyu
A1 Zhu, Kaiwen
A1 Wang, Yuhan
A1 Sun, Bomin
A1 Ashkan, Keyoumars
A1 Zhang, Chencheng
A1 Li, Dianyou
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/05/2020.04.28.20082677.abstract
AB Objective To evaluate the preference and satisfaction in the Chinese Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS).Background DBS is a widely used therapy for PD. There is now a choice between fixed-life implantable pulse generators (IPGs) and rechargeable IPGs, each having their advantages and disadvantages.Methods Two hundred and twenty PD patients treated with DBS completed a self-designed questionnaire to assess long-term satisfaction and experience with the type of battery they had chosen, and the key factors affecting their choices. The survey was performed online and double-checked for completeness and accuracy.Results The median value of follow-up length was 18 months. The most popular way for patients to learn about DBS surgery was through media (79/220, 35.9%), including the Internet and television programs. 87.3% of the DBS used rechargeable IPGs (r-IPG). The choice between rechargeable and non-rechargeable IPGs was significantly associated with the patient’s affordability , p < 0.001). Interestingly, the feature of remote programming significantly affected patients’ choices between domestic and imported brands , p < 0.001). 87.7% of the patients were satisfied with the stimulating effects as well as the implanted device. 40.6% of the patients with r-IPGs felt confident handling their devices within one week after discharge. More than half of the patients checked their batteries every week. The mean interval for battery recharge was 4.3 days. 57.8% of the patients spent around one-hour recharging, and 71.4% of them recharged the battery independently.Conclusion Most patients were satisfied with their choices of IPGs. The patients’ financial status and remote programming function were the two most critical factors in their decision. The skill of using rechargeable IPG was easy to master by most patients.Competing Interest StatementThis study was supported by the 2018 Shanghai Municipal Education Commission–Gaoyuan Nursing Grant Support (Hlgy1804kyx).Funding StatementThis study was supported by the 2018 Shanghai Municipal Education Commission–Gaoyuan Nursing Grant Support (Hlgy1804kyx).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData included in this manuscript is all collected from patients in our center, none data from other other dataset is used in our manuscript.