PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Davies, Gareth
TI  - The Epidemic Severity Index: Estimating Relative Local Severity of Novel Disease Outbreaks
AID  - 10.1101/2020.04.23.20077685
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.04.23.20077685
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/05/2020.04.23.20077685.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/05/2020.04.23.20077685.full
AB  - Determining the severity of a novel pathogen in the early stages is difficult in the absence of reliable data. The pattern of outbreaks for COVID-19 across the globe have differed markedly above and below 30°N latitudes, suggesting very different levels of severity, but countries worldwide have implemented the same lockdown strategies. Existing methods for estimating severity appear not to have been useful in informing strategic decisions, possibly due to mismatches between the data required and those available, overly sophisticated methods with undesirable biases, or perhaps confusion and uncertainly generated by the wide range of estimates these methods produced early on.The Epidemic Severity Index (ESI) is a simple, robust method for estimating the local severity of novel epidemic outbreaks using early and widely-available data and that does not depend on any estimated values. ESI allows rapid, meaningful comparisons across territories that can be tracked as the outbreaks unfold. The ESI quantifies severity relative to a parameterised baseline rather than attempting to estimate values for infection fatality rates, case fatality rates or transmission rates. The relative nature of the ESI sidesteps any problems of confidence associated with absolute rate estimation methods and offers immediate practical strategic value.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was conducted pro bono as part of an unfunded, independent international response to the pandemic crisis. No external funding was received.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData and code are available online at github. https://github.com/gruffdavies/GD-COVID-19