PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - López-Ramírez, Anyi Yannire AU - Grassi, Hilda Cristina AU - de Jesús Andrades, Efrén AU - Andrades-Grassi, Jesús Enrique TI - Comparative Application of the Fluctuation Test to the data of Morbidity by COVID-19 in United States of America, United Kingdom, Taiwan and China 2020-2023 AID - 10.1101/2024.04.06.24305422 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.04.06.24305422 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/08/2024.04.06.24305422.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/08/2024.04.06.24305422.full AB - In this work the Luria and Delbruck Fluctuation Test was comparatively applied to the data of Morbidity by COVID-19 in the United States of America (USA), United Kingdom (UK), Taiwan and China from 2020 to 2023. Three types of data were used: es.statista.com, datosmacro.expansion.com and larepublica.co without modification, but trying to avoid and justify the anomalies and inconsistencies observed. The methods originally used to establish the interactions of two populations were evaluated: the viral population with that of its host and the drift of both organisms. Only the interactive fluctuations of the weekly Variance of daily increase of Cases (Morbidity) were studied. The results showed that the Fluctuation Test is applicable to the selected data from USA, UK, Taiwan and China and other data from several countries used as controls. The study was separated into two approaches: First, comparison of the total or partial logarithmic profile of fluctuations of Variance of Cases (Morbidity) of USA, UK, Taiwan and China. Second, comparison of the values of the first fluctuation of Variance of Cases (Morbidity) in the boreal winter of 2020 for USA, UK, Taiwan, China and several countries used as controls. The results obtained for Morbidity demonstrate that USA and UK present a similar bimodal profile. China shows an inverted profile and Taiwan shows an intermediate profile between both tendencies. However, it was possible to detect some anomalies and uncertainties that were possibly derived from inconsistencies in the original data. Only USA shows a value of the first fluctuation comparable to the order of magnitude of the value of the first fluctuation of the Variance of Cases of China, in the northern winter of 2020. In the First Approach USA, UK and China had two important fluctuations: the first in the northern winter of 2020 before week 16 and the second at the beginning of northern winter of 2022, more than 100 weeks later. Taiwan showed only the latter. This latest fluctuation coincides with two events: the possible achievement of herd immunity and the emergence of Omicron variant. In this work we have evaluated whether this coincidence is casual or causal. The results obtained in the Second Approach aim to confirm the hypothesis of the animal origin of the first variant of SARS CoV-2.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:es.statista.com, datosmacro.expansion.com, larepublica.co.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors