PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Wiranto, Yumiko AU - Siengsukon, Catherine AU - Mazzotti, Diego R. AU - Burns, Jeffrey M. AU - Watts, Amber TI - Sex Differences in the Role of Sleep on Cognition in Older Adults AID - 10.1101/2024.01.08.24300996 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.01.08.24300996 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/07/2024.01.08.24300996.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/07/2024.01.08.24300996.full AB - Study Objectives The study aimed to investigate sex differences in the relationship between sleep quality (self-report and objective) and cognitive function across three domains (executive function, verbal memory, and attention) in older adults.Methods We analyzed cross-sectional data from 207 participants with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment (89 males and 118 females) aged over 60. The relationship between sleep quality and cognitive performance was estimated using generalized additive models. Objective sleep was measured with the GT9X Link Actigraph, and self-reported sleep was measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.Results We found that females exhibited stable performance of executive function with up to about 400 minutes of total sleep time, with significant declines in performance (p = 0.02) when total sleep time was longer. Additionally, a longer total sleep time contributed to lower verbal memory in a slightly non-linear manner (p = 0.03). Higher self-reported sleep complaints were associated with poorer executive function in females with normal cognition (p = 0.02). In males, a positive linear relationship emerged between sleep efficiency and executive function (p = 0.04), while self-reported sleep was not associated with cognitive performance in males with normal cognition.Conclusions Our findings suggest that the relationships between sleep quality and cognition differ between older males and females, with executive function being the most influenced by objective and self-reported sleep. Interventions targeting sleep quality to mitigate cognitive decline in older adults may need to be tailored according to sex, with distinct approaches for males and females.Statement of Significance This research is significant as it addresses the gap in a previously underexplored area of sex differences in the interplay between sleep quality and cognitive function in older populations. By examining both objective and self-reported sleep measures across three cognitive domains, the study provides valuable insights into how sleep impacts various cognitive domains differently in older males and females. Notably, the findings suggest that interventions to improve sleep quality and potentially mitigate cognitive decline may need to be sex-specific.Competing Interest StatementCS is the owner and Chief Executive Officer of Sleep Health Education, LLC.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the University of Kansas Alzheimers Disease Research Center, the National Institute on Aging (grant nos. P30AG035982; R01AG033673), and the University of Kansas General Research Fund.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of The University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Research Center gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe dataset presented in this article is not readily available because dataset requests must be made directly to the KU-ADRC. Those interested in accessing the dataset should be directed to the following website where they can complete a data request form: https://www.kumc.edu/research/alzheimers-disease-research-center/research/resources-for-researchers-and-principal-investigators.html.