PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Alonso, Cintia C. G.
AU  - de Freitas, Paulo Barbosa
AU  - Pires, Raquel
AU  - de Oliveira, Dalton Lustosa
AU  - Ferreira de Freitas, Sandra M. S.
TI  - Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Different Tests to Detect Impaired Hand Function in Parkinson’s disease
AID  - 10.1101/2020.04.25.20079392
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.04.25.20079392
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/03/2020.04.25.20079392.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/03/2020.04.25.20079392.full
AB  - Introduction Parkinson’s Disease (PD) can affect hand function. To examine the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of four traditionally used hand function tests in individuals with PD by using the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis.Methods Eighty individuals (24 with PD and 56 healthy controls) performed the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHF, with seven subtests), Nine-Hole Peg Test, and maximum power and pinch grip strength tests. The outcomes of the tests were compared between groups. The values of the area under the curve from the ROC analysis assessed the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the tests.Results Individuals with PD presented worst performance than controls in all tests, except the writing subtest of the JTHF and maximum power strength. Two subtests of the JTHF, the turning cards and moving large, heavy objects, showed the highest area under the curve in the ROC analysis. The Nine-Hole Peg Test was able to distinguish the PD stage and progression, while the simulated feeding of the JTHFT subtest showed a high area under the curve only for PD stage analysis.Conclusion Two dexterity tasks (turning cards and moving large, heavy objects) were highly discriminative of the hand function impairments in individuals with PD. The Nine-Hole Peg Test provides the most accurate identification of the PD stage and progression based on hand function impairment. Different dexterity tasks should be used depending on the aims of the evaluation, whether for diagnosis, monitoring, or classification of the PD.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis study is not a clinical trial.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be available upon request.