PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Wells, Mike
AU  - Goldstein, Lara Nicole
TI  - Using the Mercy Method to Estimate Ideal Body Weight in Children – A Description and Validation of a New Methodology
AID  - 10.1101/2020.04.27.20081430
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.04.27.20081430
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/03/2020.04.27.20081430.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/03/2020.04.27.20081430.full
AB  - Background In obese children, lipophilic medications should be dosed to total body weight (TBW) and hydrophilic medications to ideal body weight (IBW). During emergencies these weights need to be estimated to ensure that urgent drug therapy is accurate and safe. The Mercy method is a well-established weight estimation system that has recently been adapted to provide estimations of body length in children. It was therefore conceivable that this could be further modified to provide estimations of IBW.Methods A model was developed a priori using the Mercy method’s humeral length segments to predict IBW. The accuracy of this model was then tested in a sample of 13134 children from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) datasets. The accuracy of IBW estimation was determined from the percentage of estimations falling within 10% (p10) and 20% (p20) of true IBW. The model was also tested to see the accuracy of detection of obesity in the study sample.Results From the sample of 13134 children, a subset of 1318 obese children were identified. In this subset, the new Mercy method model achieved an IBW estimation accuracy p10 of 66.9% and a p20 of 95.1%. For the detection of the obese child, the model had a sensitivity of 88.6% and a specificity of 75.8%.Conclusions This study established that the Mercy method can be modified to provide a reasonably accurate estimation of IBW in obese children, with very few critical errors. The ability to the model to identify the obese child was also reasonably accurate, on a par with other such predictive methods. While other accurate methods of estimating both TBW and IBW exist, such as the PAWPER XL tape, the modified Mercy method is an acceptable alternative if such other devices are not available.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was provided for this research.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDatasets are open access.https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx