RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Maternal mental health and nutritional status of infants aged under 6 months: a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.04.03.24305269
DO 10.1101/2024.04.03.24305269
A1 Abera Mengistie, Mubarek
A1 Berhane, Melkamu
A1 Grijalva-Eternod, Carlos S.
A1 Abdissa, Alemseged
A1 Abate, Nahom
A1 Hailu, Endashaw
A1 Barthorp, Hatty
A1 Allen, Elizabeth
A1 McGrath, Marie
A1 Girma, Tsinuel
A1 Wells, Jonathan CK
A1 Kerac, Marko
A1 Beaumont, Emma
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/04/2024.04.03.24305269.abstract
AB Maternal/caregivers’ mental health (MMH) and child nutrition are both poor in low- and middle-income countries. Links between the two are plausible but poorly researched. Our aim was to inform future malnutrition management programmes by better understanding associations between MMH and the nutritional status of infants aged u6m. We conducted a health facility-based cross-sectional survey of 1060 infants in rural Ethiopia, between October 2020 and January 2021. We collected data on: MMH status (exposure) measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and infant anthropometry (outcome); length for age Z-score (LAZ), weight for age Z-score (WAZ), weight for length Z-score (WLZ), mid upper arm circumference (MUAC), head circumference for age Z-score (HCAZ) and lower leg length (LLL). Linear regression analysis was used to determine associations between exposure and outcome variables. Mean (SD) age was 13.4 (6.2) weeks. The median score for MMH problem was 0 (inter quartile range 0 - 2) and 29.5 and 11.2% reported minimal and mild to severe depression score of 1-4 and 5-25, respectively. Mean (SD) LAZ was -0.4 (1.4), WAZ -0.7 (1.3), WLZ -0.5 (1.2), MUAC 12.4 (1.3) centimetre, HCAZ 0.4 (1.3) and LLL 148 (13.9) millimetre. In adjusted analysis, minimal MMH problems was associated with infant LAZ marginally (β=-0.2; 95% CI: -0.4, 0.001) and LLL (β=-2.0; 95% CI: -3.8, -0.1), but not with other anthropometric measurements. Significant associations were not found between mild to severe depressive symptoms and infant anthropometric outcomes. Covariates positively associated with infant anthropometric measurements were higher wealth index with LAZ (β=0.08, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.13), WAZ (β=0.12, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.17), WLZ (β=0.09, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.13), MUAC (β=0.06, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.11), and HCAZ (β=0.07, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.12); higher maternal schooling with LAZ (β=0.24, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.43) and WAZ (β=0.24, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.41); female sex with WAZ (β=0.16, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.31) and HCAZ (β=0.16, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.31); higher maternal age with LLL (β= 0.29, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.52); and improved water, sanitation and hygiene status with MUAC (β=0.07, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.12) and LLL (β=0.64, 95% CI: 0.04, 1.24). Covariates negatively associated with infant anthropometric measurements include female sex with MUAC (β=-0.33, 95% CI: - 0.48, -0.18) and LLL (β=-2.51, 95% CI: -4.15, -0.87); higher household family size with WLZ (β=-0.08, 95% CI: -0.13, -0.02); exclusive breastfeeding with MUAC (β=-0.39, 95% CI: -0.55, - 0.24) and LLL (β=-7.37, 95% CI: -9.01, -5.75); and grandmother family support with WAZ (β=- 0.2, 95% CI: -0.3, -0.0001) and WLZ (β=-0.2, 95% CI: -0.4, 0.1). In conclusion, only minimal, but not mild, moderate or severe, maternal/caregivers’ depressive symptoms are associated with infant anthropometry outcomes. Whilst plausible relationship between maternal mental health problems and offspring nutritional status exist, we are not able to show this because of small number of participants with moderate to severe level of depression in our study population. Thus, further evidence to understand and establish robust relationship between maternal mental health and offspring nutritional status is required.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work is funded by Eleanor Crook Foundation (ECF)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for the original data was granted by Jimma University Institutional Review Board (ref: IHRPGD/478//2020) and by the Research Ethics Committee at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (ref 18022).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data are available with the manuscript